SOBORNIST’ AS A PHENOMENON OF DIALOGIC COMMUNICATION: EXISTENTIAL FOUNDATIONS AND MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS

Abstract

Introduction. This article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of the ideas of sobornist’. The author tries to rethink this concept in terms of the interpersonal communication theory, carries out an overview of the existing views in the Ukrainian and Russian literature on the phenomenon of sobornist’, reveals its historical, philosophical and theological context. The purpose of the article is to give an interpretation of the content of the idea of the sobornist’ as a phenomenon of dialogical communication and to describe the possibilities of its mental representation. Methods used: comparative, dialectical, historical and phenomenological analysis. Results. The thesis is based on the artificial nature of the opposition between the Eastern Christian (Orthodox) and the West Christian (Catholic) ideals of social unity. Originality. Considerable attention has been paid to the discovery of differences between traditional interpretation of sobornist’ as the unity in diversity and understanding of unity as a dialogical interpersonal connection, which inspire the apparition of the third person with its inherent transcendence and inferiority. In addition to this the sobornist’ is not identical with total unity, and even to a certain extent, is its opposite, antipode, because it relies on a completely different soil. One of the basic existential prerequisites for the emergence of the sobornist’ is the hypostasis, the personality – the ability to maintain independence from things, while remaining one of them. The next prerequisite of the sobornist’ is the ability of a person to build his relationship with the Other as a neighbour, as with You. The third factor of the sobornist’ is the ability of the persons communicating to put such existence, which is more valuable than their personal, and their common existence, or more precisely, the otherness which E. Levinas denoted as the lexeme "other than being". Conclusion. The sobornist’ is impossible outside of interpersonal, it is its deontological correlator, which expresses the uniqueness of the personal way of being, finds its reflection in the concept of dialogue.

Authors and Affiliations

Volodymyr PROTSYSHYN

Keywords

Related Articles

A ROLE OF THE ORTHODOX MONASTERIES IN FORMING THE WORLDVIEW REFERENCE-POINTS OF UKRAINIAN SOCIETY

Introduction. In exacerbation of ideological debates and interfaith contradictions of our concern is not only the Orthodox community, but also all conscious Ukrainian society today, deserves special attention as a fundam...

CATEGORICAL CHARACTER OF RESPONSIBILITY IN THE SPACE OF REVOLUTION (ON THE BASIS OF SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF OTTO VON BISMARCK’S ACTIVITY)

For any society modernization is a revolutionary change. However the question of whether, in what society would be the population of the previous society remains sharply debating. About the role of the concept of the pro...

Categorical imperative in measuring of vital wisdom.

The article is dedicated to establishment of possibilities of internal (psychological) indoor and the will to humanity humanize (spiritualize) the outside world through the understanding of effective forms of interaction...

PSYCHOLOGISM AS А HISTORICO-PHILOSOPHICAL PHENOMENON

Introduction. The end of the XXth – the beginning of the XXIth century brought a brand new essence to the problem of psychologism. The studies in logic, philosophy of consciousness, cognitive sciences came to focus on “n...

NEW MEDIA AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF A DIALOGUE IN MASS RELIGIOUS COMMUNICATION

Introduction. Information society and mass culture are actively influencing on all types of communication. Religion adapts to a new communicative environment and offers its religious mass media. They combine the mass cha...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP456341
  • DOI 10.31651/2076-5894-2018-2-45-52
  • Views 90
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Volodymyr PROTSYSHYN (2018). SOBORNIST’ AS A PHENOMENON OF DIALOGIC COMMUNICATION: EXISTENTIAL FOUNDATIONS AND MENTAL REPRESENTATIONS. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(2), 45-52. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-456341