STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF LATERITIC SOIL STABILIZED WITH TERRASIL AND ZYCOBOND NANNO CHEMICALS

Journal Title: International Journal of Civil Engineering - Year 2018, Vol 7, Issue 2

Abstract

Laterite is a major material in road construction. However, Stabilization of weak laterite with cement or lime is expensive and well reported. There is a paucity of information on stabilization of weak laterite with Nano chemicals. This study investigates the Geotechnical properties of weak laterites Stabilized with Nano chemicals (Terrasil and Zycobond). ′ 0 Lateritic soil samples were collected from two different burrow pits (Sample A, latitude: 80 08 N longitude: ′ ′ ′ ′ 0 0 0 40 15 E and (Sample B, Latitude: 8 25 N, Longitude: 4 .3 E, Altitude: 306 ). Terrasils and Zycobonds were measured in weight to stabilize the laterites at 5, 10, 15, 20%, respectively. Geotechnical testing, which includes: Particle Size Analysis, Liquid Limit (LL), Plastic Limit (PL), Maximum Dry Density (MDD), Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) were carried out on stabilized and unstabilized samples. Particle size distribution analysis showed that the percentage passing sieve No 200 for Sample A and B were 76.6% and 66.5%, respectively. Using the AASHTO classification system, the soils falls into A-5 - A-7 soils. The LL, PI, 3 MDD and OMC for Terrasil stabilized samples A ranges from (36 -52)%, (8 -32)%, (1.73 - 2.34)g/cm , (7.20 - 10.8)% 3 Sample B values range from (36 - 58)%, (15-34)%, (1.8 - 2.63)g/cm ,(10.5 - 14.0)%. Zycobond Stabilized samples A varies 3 from (45 - 50)%, (14 -30)%, (2.21 - 1.92)g/cm , (11.5 - 24.0)%. Sample B values vary from (37 - 56)%, (11-38)%, 3 (1.79 - 2.09)g/cm , (9.6 - 12.4)%. The average CBR (soaked and unsoaked) for Terrasil stabilized samples ranges from (5 - 6)%, (13-17)% and (4 - 6)%, ( 20 - 25)%. The CBR for Zycobond samples ranges from (5 -7)%, (20-29)% and (3-14)%, ( 22-55)% for samples A and B, respectively. This Study showed that the Optimum percentage of Nano Chemicals that gave the highest Compressive Strength was 15%. Nano Chemicals (Terrasil and Zycobond) enhanced the Geotechnical properties of weak lateritic soil.

Authors and Affiliations

Olaniyan O. S, Ajileye V. O

Keywords

Related Articles

CONSTRUCTION OF TUNNELS, BY NEW AUSTRIAN TUNNELLING METHOD (NATM) AND BY TUNNEL BORING MACHINE (TBM)

Tunnels have played a vital role in the evolution and Sustenance of man-kind through the ages. History has seen the evolution of tunneling starting with cave formation, for water management, under ground transportation,...

THE EFFECTS OF GEOTECHNICAL AND STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS ON THE COLLAPSE OF COLLAPSIBLE SOILS SUBJECTED TO A VERTICAL LOAD

This study consists on the moduating of the behavior of a collapsible soil, under vertica laod. The case considered in this work, is a real project of a foundation placed on a collapsible soil which is presented by Thanh...

SUSTAINABLE MASS HOUSING IN INDIA, ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

India is one of the fast urbanizing countries in the world. Being a developing country, India’s urban population is increasing and estimates forecasts that by 2041, urban population country reaches 50%. In this context i...

SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH OF BRICK MASONRY

Load bearing masonry walls of a building, when subjected to earthquake experience in plane and out of plane forces which may lead to sudden collapse. Since a state of pure shear leads to diagonal tension and compression,...

Experimental Studies on the Effect of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash-Lime on the 15 Physical and Mechanical Properties of Montmorillonitic Soil

Industrial waste generated is a major contributor of total waste worldwide. The proper mechanism for management of these waste needs to be established, especially in developing countries. The conventional method of dispo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP275629
  • DOI -
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olaniyan O. S, Ajileye V. O (2018). STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF LATERITIC SOIL STABILIZED WITH TERRASIL AND ZYCOBOND NANNO CHEMICALS. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(2), 1-12. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-275629