Summary Workshop Report: Facilitating Oral Product Development and Reducing Regulatory Burden Through Novel Approaches to Assess Bioavailability/Bioequivalence

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2012, Vol 14, Issue 3

Abstract

This summary workshop report highlights presentations and over-arching themes from an October 2011 workshop. Discussions focused on best practices in the application of biopharmaceutics in oral drug product development and evolving bioequivalence approaches. Best practices leverage biopharmaceutic data and other drug, formulation, and patient/disease data to identify drug development challenges in yielding a successfully performing product. Quality by design and product developability paradigms were discussed. Development tools include early development strategies to identify critical absorption factors and oral absorption modeling. An ongoing theme was the desire to comprehensively and systematically assess risk of product failure via the quality target product profile and root cause and risk analysis. However, a parallel need is reduced timelines and fewer resources. Several presentations discussed applying Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) and in vitro–in vivo correlations in development and in post-development and discussed both resource savings and best scientific practices. The workshop also focused on evolving bioequivalence approaches, with emphasis on highly variable products (HVDP), as well as specialized modified-release products. In USA, two bioequivalence approaches for HVDP are the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach and the two-stage group-sequential design. An adaptive sequential design approach is also acceptable in Canada. In European Union, two approaches for HVDP are a two-stage design and an approach to widen Cmax acceptance limits. For some specialized modified-release products, FDA now requests partial area under the curve. Rationale and limitations of such metrics were discussed (e.g., zolpidem and methylphenidate). A common theme was the benefit of the scientific and regulatory community developing, validating, and harmonizing newer bioequivalence methodologies (e.g., BCS-based waivers and HVDP trial designs).

Authors and Affiliations

James E. Polli, Jack A. Cook, Barbara M. Davit, Paul A. Dickinson, Domenick Argenti, Nancy Barbour, Alfredo García-Arieta, Jean-Marie Geoffroy, Kerry Hartauer, Shoufeng Li, Amitava Mitra, Francis X. Muller, Vivek Purohit, Manuel Sanchez-Felix, John W. Skoug, Kin Tang

Keywords

Related Articles

PEGylation of a Factor VIII–Phosphatidylinositol Complex: Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity in Hemophilia A Mice

Hemophilia A is an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by the deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII). Exogenous FVIII is administered therapeutically, and due to a short half-life, frequent infusions are often required. Fifteen...

Use of FT-NIR transmission spectroscopy for the quantitative analysis of an active ingredient in a translucent pharmaceutical topical gel formulation

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the use of transmission Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy for quantitative analysis of an active ingredient in a translucent gel formulation. Gels were p...

Choice of LC-MS Methods for the Absolute Quantification of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Human Tissue: a Comparative Cost Analysis

The online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9712-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A guide for reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses: A Swedish perspective

Population pharmacokinetic analyses are frequently part of regulatory submissions and are mainly used to provide information on special populations (effects of age, renal impairment, etc) and drug-drug interactions. A va...

In vitro–In Vivo Correlations: Tricks and Traps

In vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is a biopharmaceutical tool recommended to be used in development of formulation. When validated, it can speed up development of formulation, be used to fix dissolution limits...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP681252
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-012-9376-z
  • Views 45
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

James E. Polli, Jack A. Cook, Barbara M. Davit, Paul A. Dickinson, Domenick Argenti, Nancy Barbour, Alfredo García-Arieta, Jean-Marie Geoffroy, Kerry Hartauer, Shoufeng Li, Amitava Mitra, Francis X. Muller, Vivek Purohit, Manuel Sanchez-Felix, John W. Skoug, Kin Tang (2012). Summary Workshop Report: Facilitating Oral Product Development and Reducing Regulatory Burden Through Novel Approaches to Assess Bioavailability/Bioequivalence. The AAPS Journal, 14(3), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-681252