SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES OF MODIFICATION IN ENGLISH TESTAMENTARY DISCOURSE

Abstract

The article deals with syntactic structures of modification in English testamentary discourse. The structure of the modification consists of two constituents H + M, where H is the main component, and M is a modifier. Subordination is a type of connection between components, and a main component defines the form of a modifier. The aim of the article is to investigate syntactic structures of modification in English testamentary discourse. To achieve the goal one should complete the following tasks: 1) to analyse the notion of syntactic structures of modification and 2) to single out syntactic structures of modification in English Last Wills and Testaments. The subject of the paper is syntactic structures of modification in English testamentary discourse. Study materials are based on 400 English Last Wills and Testaments conducted between 1837 and 2015. There is no single approach to the notion of syntactic structures. U. Francis first introduced this concept in 1958 and developed the theory of syntactic structures. He singled out four main types: structure of predication, structure of comple- mentation, structure modification and structure of coordination. A. Korsakov studied this problem among the domestic scientists. He used the term syntactic structure to analyze a simple sentence in Modern English. As any language unit syntactic structures refer through the mind of the speaker and listener to something in the objective world, including man. The scientist notes that a structure of modification consists of a head or a constituent modified and its modifier. Such constructions are also called headed or endocentric. They have the same function as one of their immediate constituents. M. Mirchenko, O. Obrazcova, O. Selivanova and O. Khromchenko greatly contributed to the study. The analysis of Last Wills and Testaments made it possible to conclude that adjectives are used as modifiers the most Mart + H (28%), then prepositional phrase H + Prep + Mnoun (19%), complex multicomponent models (18.7%), the numerals Mnum + H (14%), the other noun H + Vnoun (12.5%) and a combination of participle said + noun and parti- ciple said + first and last name (7.8%).

Authors and Affiliations

Olha KULYNA

Keywords

Related Articles

PROBLEMS OF RETHINKING OF SAKRED TRADITIONS IN UKRAINIAN ART

In modern socio-cultural space the concept of “spiritual music” has a much broader meaning than a century ago. For today it seems quite typical, that relief manifestations in Ukrainian spiritual and musical creativity ha...

METADRAMATIC POETICS OF IGOR KOSTETSKY’S PLAY “TWINS WILL MEET AGAIN”

Igor Kostetsky is a bright representative of the Ukrainian diaspora literature of the twentieth century. His drama has a tendency to experiments and innovations. This was promoted by author’s theatrical education and pra...

A LITERARY TEXT AS A MEDIATOR IN INTER-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION

The article investigates the importance of reading literary texts in gaining cross-cultural competence for successful inter-cultural communication. Reading literary texts facilitate fundamental mastering of culture, unde...

Research approach with GeoGebra dynamic mathematics system usage

The ef¿ ciency of using GeoGebra system in the process of solving mathematical problems is demonstrated. Attention is focused on the features of the theory of solving research problems. The algorithm for solving research...

INCORPORATING SMARTPHONES INTO AN ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSROOM IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS

The article deals with the expediency of using new innovative techniques such as computers, Internet, White boards, tablets and smartphones in foreign language lessons at the present stage of training where the main task...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP645351
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Olha KULYNA (2018). SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES OF MODIFICATION IN ENGLISH TESTAMENTARY DISCOURSE. Актуальні питання гуманітарних наук: Міжвузівський збірник наукових праць молодих вчених Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету, 20(2), 63-66. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-645351