Systematic bias in epidemiological studies

Journal Title: Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής - Year 2007, Vol 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Bias can creep into epidemiologic studies from many directions. Various types of specific bias have been described, but it is helpful to classify bias into three broad categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. Selection bias is a systematic bias in a study that stems from the procedures used to  elect subjects and from factors that influence study participation. It comes about when the association between the determinant under study and the outcome differs for those who participate and those who do not participate in the study. There are two kinds of selection bias, volunteer bias (or self- election bias) and selection bias, often referred to as the “healthy worker effect”. Information bias can arise because the information collected about or from study subjects is erroneous. A simple definition of confounding would be the confusion, or mixing, of effects: this definition implies that the effect of the determinant under study is mixed with the effect of another variable (extraneous determinant), leading to a bias. Extraneous determinants are referred to as “potential confounders of the conditional relation of interest” because they are predictors of the occurrence of the outcome at issue. When extraneous determinants have different distributions among the compared categories of the determinant under study they constitute actual confounders. Confounding is a systematic error that investigators aim either to prevent or to remove from a study. In study design, there are two common methods to prevent confounding, randomization and restriction. A third method to prevent confounding is matching, which prevents confounding in studies with closed populations, but in case-control studies, surprisingly, does not. Two methods that can be used to deal with confounding in the analysis of data are stratification and regressionmodels.

Authors and Affiliations

P. Galanis, L. Sparos

Keywords

Related Articles

Constantin Levaditi: An unknown pioneer in immunology research

The aim of this study is to present the scientific work of Constantin Levaditi (1874–1953), the unknown pioneer in immunology research. Information was collected through secondary data, such as international bibliographi...

Book review

No abstract available

Medical, social and economic implications of computed tomography and the evolution of multislice computed tomography scanners

Studies show that in the USA the radiation generated by computed tomography (CT) examinations causes annually 3,000 fatal cancers, while the increasing trend in its use reaches 10%, overloading the budget of society. The...

Λευχαιμία στην κύηση

Η λευχαιμία είναι η δεύτερη σε συχνότητα κακοήθης νόσος που προσβάλλει τις γυναίκες αναπαραγωγικής ηλικίας. Πρόσφατες μελέτες επιβεβαιώνουν ότι η κύηση δεν επηρεάζει αρνητικά την πρόγνωση της λευχαιμίας, παρά μόνο εάν κα...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP123692
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

P. Galanis, L. Sparos (2007). Systematic bias in epidemiological studies. Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής, 24(4), 373-378. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-123692