Systematic bias in epidemiological studies

Journal Title: Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής - Year 2007, Vol 24, Issue 4

Abstract

Bias can creep into epidemiologic studies from many directions. Various types of specific bias have been described, but it is helpful to classify bias into three broad categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. Selection bias is a systematic bias in a study that stems from the procedures used to  elect subjects and from factors that influence study participation. It comes about when the association between the determinant under study and the outcome differs for those who participate and those who do not participate in the study. There are two kinds of selection bias, volunteer bias (or self- election bias) and selection bias, often referred to as the “healthy worker effect”. Information bias can arise because the information collected about or from study subjects is erroneous. A simple definition of confounding would be the confusion, or mixing, of effects: this definition implies that the effect of the determinant under study is mixed with the effect of another variable (extraneous determinant), leading to a bias. Extraneous determinants are referred to as “potential confounders of the conditional relation of interest” because they are predictors of the occurrence of the outcome at issue. When extraneous determinants have different distributions among the compared categories of the determinant under study they constitute actual confounders. Confounding is a systematic error that investigators aim either to prevent or to remove from a study. In study design, there are two common methods to prevent confounding, randomization and restriction. A third method to prevent confounding is matching, which prevents confounding in studies with closed populations, but in case-control studies, surprisingly, does not. Two methods that can be used to deal with confounding in the analysis of data are stratification and regressionmodels.

Authors and Affiliations

P. Galanis, L. Sparos

Keywords

Related Articles

Drug-induced hyperkalemia

No abstract available

Inflammatory mediators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Review of related pathogenic mechanisms and efficacy of novel targeted therapies

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health problem which is increasing in prevalence and is now the fourth leading cause of death in the US. The pathophysiological mechanisms that control the d...

Message 8: “Use safer products”

The role of consumer products in injury causation is crucial. It has been estimated that about 70% of all unintentional home and leisure injuries in the European Union (EU) are associated with consumer products. Risk gro...

Comparative assessment of self-reported satisfaction in attaining basic skills <br /> in preventive medicine among medical students

OBJECTIVE To assess self-reported satisfaction in attaining skills of basic preventive medicine and completion of death certificates among undergraduate students in two of the seven medical schools in Greece, in order to...

Assessment of the nutritional index of the elderly in an Open Care Center and correlation with their socioeconomic status and health indicators

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the nutrition index of elderly persons in an Open Care Center for the Elderly and its correlation with their socioeconomic status and health indicators. METHOD The sample consisted of 120 elderly...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP123692
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

P. Galanis, L. Sparos (2007). Systematic bias in epidemiological studies. Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής, 24(4), 373-378. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-123692