TEMPORAL REMOVAL OF JUDGE FROM REALIZATION OF JUSTICE IN CONNECTION WITH BRINGING IN TO CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
Journal Title: Юридичний науковий електронний журнал - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue
Abstract
An author examines some problem questions of removal from realization of justice in connection with bringing in to criminal responsibility. Grounded, that the dismissal of judge on a current criminal judicial legislation on the basis of the motivated solicitor of the Prosecutor general of Ukraine of Higher Council of Justice groundlessly removes a court from the process of decision-making about application of the indicated measure of providing of criminal trial. Before the acceptance of changes in Criminal Procedural Code (next – CPC) of Ukraine 2012 about the removal of judge in connection with bringing in of him to criminal responsibility made decision the Higher Qualifying Commission of Judges of Ukraine (next – HQCJU). This commission had to conduct only qualifying attestation and disciplinary productions in regard to judges. That is, the HQCJU in fact replaced the investigative judge (court) and temporarily restricted the constitutional rights of the person (the judge) by laying down the judicial control: she examined the petition of the General Prosecutor of Ukraine, examined the materials presented, which could indicate that the suspect could negatively influence the witnesses, unlawfully to oppose criminal proceedings, etc. At the same time, members of the HQCJU could interrogate witnesses. In 2016, as a result of the inclusion in the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine of item 155–1, the decision to dismiss the judge from office is entrusted to the educated Higher Council of Justice, which, in the author’s opinion, also, by substituting for the court, imposes on himself a function of judicial control that is not characteristic of this body. All this contradicts the European standards – the adoption of a procedural decision on the application of procedural coercion measures belongs to the exclusive competence of the court. The European Court of Human Rights acknowledged that the principle of the rule of law proceeds from the premise that interference of the executive authorities in Human Rights must be under effective judicial control.
Authors and Affiliations
Р. Д. , Арланова
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP479996
- DOI -
- Views 87
- Downloads 0
NORMATIVELY LEGAL ADJUSTING OF TRANSPORTATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL AIR REPORT: CUSTOM ASPECT
The article is sanctified to research of the normatively legal adjusting of activity of air transport, that is related to moving through the custom border of Ukraine. It is found out, that a concept «air transport», «avi...
CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL MECHANISMS OF IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIC ACTS PARLIAMENT OF UKRAINE: THE DISADVANTAGES AND AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
The article investigates the constitutional and legal mechanism for implementing the policy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Determined implementation of strategic concepts acts of Parliament and justified belief that t...
STATUS OF LEGISLATIVE PROVISION IN ENTRGY-EFFICIENT LIGHTING OF UKRAINE
Lighting is the obvious target of state energy efficiency programs, because there are highly profitable savings from using more efficient equipment and practices, there is considerable market barriers that prevent end-us...
LEGAL PROTECTION OF ANTI-CORRUPTION WHISTLEBLOWERS
The author stressed the importance of protecting anti-corruption whistleblowers in Ukraine as an important tool to boost people’s reporting on corruption сrimes. The official data demonstrate that law enforcement agencie...
TRANSFER PRICING PENALTIES IN UKRAINE. ANALYSIS OF THE PRACTICE OF EU COUNTRIES IN SPHERE OF TRANSFER PRICING PENALTIES
The article deals with the question of the transfer pricing penalties provided under Ukrainian legislation for violations, which is arising in the field of transfer pricing, as well as with research of their nature and a...