The Comparison between the Outcomes of Streptokinase and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Journal Title: UNKNOWN - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: To compare between the outcomes of streptokinase and primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. The inappropriate treatment, misdiagnosis, contraindications of procedures can result in complications of procedures and increased mortality of patients. The present study aimed to compare between the outcomes of streptokinase and primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients to minimize the death rates in MI patients. Methodology: The descriptive study was conducted at Gulab Devi Chest Hospital. All the samples were collected from cardiac department. A Performa was designed for recording the risk factors, ST elevation, clinical findings and lab results of the patients. Results: In this cross-sectional study of 100 patients, the mean age was 51.02+ 10.956. Male gender was predominant. There were more chances (67.00%) of acute LVF in streptokinase and less chances (21.00%) in primary PCI. According to this study, there was more chances (67.00%) of cardiogenic shock in streptokinase and less chances (21.00%) in primary PCI. In this study there were equal chances of stroke in streptokinase and primary PCI. In this study there were more chances (28.00%) of bleeding from any site in streptokinase and less chances (0%) in primary PCI. According to results there were chances (24.00%) of renal failure in streptokinase and less chances (0%) in primary PCI. There were more chances (9.43%) of rescue PCI in streptokinase and less chances in primary PCI. In this study, there were more chances of arrhythmias (26.41%) in streptokinase patients and less chances in primary PCI. In this study, there were also more chances of death (1.92%) in streptokinase and less chance in primary PCI. So according to my study primary PCI was better than streptokinase with less complications. Conclusion: Primary PCI was better than streptokinase to cure the myocardial infarction and better to minimize the complications after procedure.

Authors and Affiliations

Zarnab Tariq, Majid Kaleem

Keywords

Related Articles

Health Impacts on Pregnant Females during Disasters in Pakistan

Introduction: Pakistan is vulnerable to many hazards due to its geography and climate condition, like floods, earthquakes, droughts and landslides. Some manmade hazards also provoking us like, road traffic accidents, fir...

Preface to The International Journal of Frontier Sciences

Hundreds of thousands of research papers are published every year all over the world. Scientists give their best in the field of research. Every researcher has a valuable contribution to scientific knowledge and ultimate...

Frequency of Hepatotoxicity in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients taking Anti-Tuberculosis Therapy

Abstract Background: Tuberculosis is a global pandemic which affects millions of people every year. The treatment of tuberculosis consists of simultaneous use of several drugs for a prolonged period of time, therefore an...

Frequency of Predisposing Factor of Nausea and Vomiting after Chest Surgery under General Anaesthesia

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting are common and distressing postsurgical symptoms. These symptoms are of particular concern in outpatient surgery because they may require additional direct resources, such as...

Life Quality of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea patients after Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Therapy

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea is an emerging sleeping disorder affecting much population around the world due to obesity and other medical conditions. My literature review will explain the current status of OSA worldwide and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP648217
  • DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2545920
  • Views 125
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Zarnab Tariq, Majid Kaleem (2017). The Comparison between the Outcomes of Streptokinase and Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. UNKNOWN, 1(2), 33-50. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-648217