The Concept of the Civil Religion of Robert Bellah: Pro et Contra

Journal Title: Соціологічні студії - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 13

Abstract

The article argues that the modern discourse on civil religion originates from the works of American social scientist R. Bellah. This phenomenon of R. Bellah has defined as a collection of common meanings, symbols, rituals, holidays, ideas and subconsciousness, which the overwhelming majority of the population, regardless of religious preference or their absence, perceives as an individual, common, having a sacred meaning and meaning. This set of beliefs, symbols and rituals related to the sacred sphere is not brought into American society, but is the result of American history and cultural background, and therefore the civil religion is institutionalized in the community, and therefore it exists as a real social and spiritual entity and has social significance. The argument of R. Bellah and his followers about the nonidentity of Christianity and civil religion, as well as its similarity to traditional religion is analyzed. The paper analyzes the definition of the civil religion of the adherents of the theory of R. Bellah, indicating their peculiarity. It is shown that in accordance with the concept of R. Bellah and his supporters, the main functions of the civil religion are: convergence of different groups with different religions, which enables to realize their significant moral potential in public life; legitimizing the existing power in society and justifying the principles of its criticism; the glorification of the spirit of the nation; formation of readiness of members of society for the joint goals and objectives. It is revealed that the content of the critique of R. Bellah’s concept of civil religion is reduced to the following: civil religion appears as idolatry to the nation; it can contribute to such a legitimization of political order, which can lead to totalitarianism (M. Cristi); since every aspect of American civil religion was formed through the experience of the war, this religion is the apotheosis of American militarism (B. Ehrenreich); American civil religion justifies hegemony in foreign policy and discriminates against the general population within the country (I. Zadorozhnyuk). The author outlined the problem of future research.

Authors and Affiliations

Leonid Kondratyk

Keywords

Related Articles

The Functions of Ethnic Culture in the Era of the «New Regionalism» (Socio-Philosophical Analysis)

The article considers and analyzes the phenomenon of ethnic culture in the modern social process. Sociology marks the end of another wave of globalization and the beginning of the formation of local resources, which are...

Condition of Lutsk’s Districts in Terms of its Residents

The analysis dealing with the condition of the city of Lutsk as a whole and its districts in particular has been made herein according to the data of the opinion poll held in June-July 2015 (N = 622, A <_0,05). In gener...

Free Walking Tour as a Way of Urban Patriotism Actualization

The paper deals with some aspects of free city tours as a modern tourism practice and the features of its introduction in Ukrainian cities, special its impact on cities inhabitans. For this purpose there was made a serie...

Virtual Tour as a Way of Creating of a Positive Image of the City (Based on «Virtual Lutsk» Project)

Due to the rapid development and wide use of the modern innovative and information technologies, particularly in tourism, new opportunities in the formation of the positive image of the city, region or a tourist region a...

Understanding as the Basis for Social and Communicative Interaction

The article is devoted to revealing the essence and the basic characteristics of social and communicative interaction. The role of understanding in the formation of social and communicative interaction is being defined....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP608535
  • DOI 10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-29-36
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Leonid Kondratyk (2018). The Concept of the Civil Religion of Robert Bellah: Pro et Contra. Соціологічні студії, 2(13), 29-36. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-608535