The effects of forward rotation of posture on heavy intensity cycling: Implications of UCI rule 1.3.013
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 3
Abstract
UCI rule 1.3.013 limits the forward displacement of the nose of the saddle to 5cm rearward of the centre of the bottom-bracket. This study tests the effects of contravening this rule on 4km laboratory time trials and highlights biomechanical and physiological responses that could be of interest to coaches and bike fitters. Ten competitive male cyclists age 26±2 (mean±SD) yrs, height 180±5 cm, body mass 71±6 kg; V̇ O2max 70.9±8.6 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed 4km time trials and heavy intensity bouts. Riding posture was rotated forward where the nose of the saddle was 0, 2, 4, and 6cm to the rear of the bottom bracket (P0, P2, P4 and P6). End time, power, cardiorespiratory responses, lower appendage kinematics and crank torque kinetics were measured. There was no significant effect of position on 4 km time trials completion time or power. During 4 km time trials and heavy intensity bouts, gas exchange variables and lower limb range of motion were unchanged (P>0.05). Trunk lean angle, cardiac output and stroke volume were greater at P6 than other positions (P<0.05). Angular velocity of the hip over top dead centre (350-10°) and the hip peak torque angle were greater at P0 than other positions (P<0.05). Peak and mean torque were unchanged (P>0.05). Results indicate, contravening rule 1.3.013 does not bring about improvements to 4km laboratory TTs. The rearward shift in peak crank torque most likely occurs as a function of altered muscle activation. Haemodynamic variations are possibly related to changes in peripheral resistance at the most forward position. Further work is necessary to allude to probable improvements in aerodynamics.
Authors and Affiliations
Oliver Caddy| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Matthew A Timmis| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom., Dan Gordon| Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences Department of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2948
- DOI -
- Views 401
- Downloads 19
Estimation of Handgrip Position Based on Force Measurement During Steady Pedaling
There have been many studies on pedaling skills (Bini et al., 2013) to improve cycling efficiency. Riding position of upper body as well as leg motion is very important for cycling because it has a substantial impact on...
The effect of aerodynamic characteristics on the drafting effect in track cycling
Since the aim of the men’s team pursuit is to accomplish a distance of 4000m as fast as possible, reducing aerodynamic drag by means of drafting can attribute in achieving this goal. Broker et al.1 quantified the average...
Comparison of power output demands for a top-10 ranking between Tour de France and Vuelta a España
Background: Grand Tours (GT) are extreme endurance cycling events with about 3500 km covered in twenty-one stages during three weeks. Using the heart rate measurement, Lucia et al. (Lucia et al., 2003: Medicine & Science...
The effect of exercise mode on salivary IgA secretion in high level triathletes
Background: It is widely accepted that exercise of either long duration or high intensity can have suppressive effects on the immune system. However, it remains to be identified if exercise mode plays a part in the deter...
Validity of Track Aero System to assess aerodynamic drag in professional cyclists
Purpose: Aerodynamic drag is the main resistance (80-90 %) among the total resistive forces (RT, N) opposing motion on level ground in cycling. It is important to decrease it to improve the performance in time-trial (TT)...