The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Journal Title: Medical Journal Armed Forces - Year 2017, Vol 73, Issue 2

Abstract

Peer reviewers are expected to be experts in a field of study and should be versed with the pertinent literature related with the manuscript they are reviewing. Editors might not necessarily be experts in a particular field, but they have the responsibility of overseeing the requests made by peers, and assessing whether these are ethically appropriate, or not. Thus, requests by peers to cite unrelated literature, which may or may not be their own literature, could be unethical, especially if the objective is to improve their own citations or to boost the citations of the journal for which they are reviewing. In contrast, requests to cite pertinent work that is in fact missing from the paper's literature, even if it may be the reviewer or editor's work, or from the same journal, is acceptable. Editors ultimately approve the requests and suggestions made by reviewers, so inappropriate suggestions made by peer reviewers are the responsibility of the editor and journal. There needs to be a bias-free mechanism in place that offers protection to authors who wish to complain, and consequences for editors who do not conduct an impartial decision. Authors have the right to challenge such suggestions, but may face unfair retaliation in the form of a rejection if they resist making changes that they perceive as being inappropriate.

Authors and Affiliations

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Keywords

Related Articles

Giant omental lipoma in an elderly female patient

A lipoma is a benign non-invasive encapsulated mesenchymal tumour that resembles normal fat. It is ubiquitous and the commonest tumour to affect soft tissues. Although a lipoma may arise in any tissue containing fat, ome...

Changing paradigm in the scientific publication process: Are we encouraging Science or Pseudoscience? Urgent need for introspection and self regulation

Scientific research and its subsequent publication in a peer reviewed journal (preferably) are essential components of professional development in the field of medicine. Scientists have endeavored over the centuries to i...

A study of therapy targeted EGFR/ALK mutations in Indian patients with lung adenocarcinoma: A clinical and epidemiological study

Background: Established predictive biomarkers for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) include sensitizing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene. The prim...

Dengue myocarditis masquerading as ST elevation myocardial infarction

Dengue fever is a common arboviral disease, which has a wide clinical spectrum ranging from a mild febrile illness to severe forms such as dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome. Cardiac involvement in dengue...

Supraventricular tachycardia requiring repeated cardioversion in a 32-day-old baby

Cardiac arrhythmia is not so uncommon in a young infant but recognition in neonate and infant is not easy. The management of cardiac arrhythmia with cardiogenic shock, nonresponsive to pharmacological cardioversion in a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP623288
  • DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008
  • Views 81
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (2017). The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. Medical Journal Armed Forces, 73(2), 181-183. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-623288