“The hard problem” of consciousness in the light of phenomenology of аrtificial intelligence
Journal Title: Схід - Year 2019, Vol 159, Issue 1
Abstract
Purpose: The widest use of artificial intelligence technologies tends to uncontrolled growth. At the same time, in modern scientific thought there is no adequate understanding of the consequences of the introduction of artificial intelligence in the daily life of a person as its irremovable element. In addition, the very essence of what could be called the “thinking” of artificial intelligence remains the philosophical Terra Incognita. However, it is precisely the features of the flow of intelligent machine processes that, both from the point of view of intermediate goals, and in the sense of final results, can pose serious threats. Modeling the “phenomenology of AI” leads to the need to reformulate the central questions of the philosophy of consciousness, such as the “difficult problem of consciousness”, and require the search for ways and means of articulation of the “human dimension” of reality for AI. Theoretical basis. The study is based on a phenomenological methodology, which is used in the model of artificial thinking. The implementation of Artificial Intelligence technologies is not accompanied by the development of a philosophy of human coexistence and AI. The algorithms underlying the activities of currently existing intellectual technologies do not guarantee that their intermediate and final results comply with ethical criteria. Today, one should ponder over nature and the purpose of separating physical reality in the primary for our Self mental stream. Originality of the research lies in the fact that the solution to the "hard problem of consciousness" is connected with the interpretation of qualia as the representation of the "physical" as related to bodily states. From this point of view, the resolution of the "hard problem of consciousness" can be associated with the interpretation of qualia as the representation of the "physical". In the "thinking process" of AI it is necessary to apply restrictions related to the fixation of the metaphysical meaning of the human body with precisely human parameters. Conclusions. It is necessary to take a different look at the connection between thinking and purposeful action, including due action, which means to look at ethics differently. “The basis of universal law” will then consist (including for AI), on the one hand, of preserving the parameters of material processes that are necessary for human existence, and on the other, of maintaining the integrity of that semantic universe, in relation to which certain senses only exist.
Authors and Affiliations
Oleksandr Bilokobylskyi
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP484876
- DOI 10.21847/1728-9343.2019.1(159).157609
- Views 181
- Downloads 0
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: SCIENTIFIC COGNITION METHODOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
The paper explores methodological approaches to determination of the essence and criteria of economic system classification. Among diversified approaches to classification of economic systems two major ones are identifie...
REVIEW OF MONOGRAPH
Панфілова Т. О. Становлення громадянського суспільства у Західній Україні (ХІХ - перша третина ХХ століття) : [монографія] / Т. О. Панфілова ; Національна академія наук України, Інститут українознавства ім. І. Крип'якеви...
THE DIALECTIC OF NEO-MYTHOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF "CARNIVAL RITUAL" PERSON IN THE WORKS BY YURIY ANDRUKHOVYCH
Artistic practices of postmodern art do not only express the principles of the conceptions of the world of modern culture but on the whole they prepare the anthropological "project" of a cosmopolit. But the danger of lev...
INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE HEIDEGGER STUDIES: AMERICAN CONTEXT
The dynamics of Heidegger studies in international intellectual process is the real challenge for the Ukrainian scientific community that makes us look for effective means of generalization and learning context and the c...
CONCEPTUALIZATION OF SUBJECT IN HEIDEGGER AND BADIOU: A SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUNDS
Heidegger and Badiou are not likely to be received as philosophical figures inheriting much in common. The only obvious ground which backs both thinkers is that of ontology as primary focus of their intellectual endeavor...