The Huawei Case and Its Aftermath: a New Test for a New Type of Abuse
Journal Title: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies - Year 2017, Vol 10, Issue 16
Abstract
Competition law sets limits on the exercise of intellectual property rights by dominant companies, namely in cases involving standard essential patents (SEPs). This article will examine the framework for SEP owners’ right to seek an injunction, discussing competitive problems that such situations may cause as well as the solutions adopted by the European Institutions, comparing them with the US and Japanese approach, and finally reflecting upon the opportunity for a new test for a new type of abuse. Although the three legal orders – US, EU and Japan – apply different laws establishing a general presumption against injunctions in SEPs encumbered with FRAND commitments, their goal is the same: to protect the interest of the SEP holder to obtain a remuneration without an abusive recourse to injunctions. I will argue that, in the EU, the Huawei case created a new test for a new type of abuse, improving the comprehensibility and certainty for the companies involved in standardization across Europe and allowing the harmonization of national judicial solutions regarding the seeking of injunctions in the SEPs context. In spite of some uncertainties, the new test clarifies the role that competition rules should play in cases of abuses by SEPs owners.
Authors and Affiliations
Sofia Oliveira Pais
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP318383
- DOI 10.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2017.10.16.1
- Views 80
- Downloads 0
Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016. Trier (Germany), 24–25 November 2016. (conference report)
On 24–25 November 2016, the Academy of European Law (ERA) hosted in Trier the Annual Conference on European State Aid Law 2016, organised with the support of Jacques Derenne (Sheppard Mullin, Brussels...
(Why) Did EU Net Neutrality Rules Overshoot the ark? Internet, Disruptive Innovation and EU Competition Law & Policy
This essay raises a number of theses in support for a more liberalised approach to EU Net Neutrality rules. It offers a graded system of levels of regulatory intervention, arguing that soft Net Neutrality rules are capab...
The Scope of the Implementation of the Damages Directive in CEE States
The Damages Directive has a rather limited scope, focusing only on damages claims stemming from anticompetitive agreements or abuse of a dominant position, provided such conduct was able to affect trade between EU Member...
Effectiveness of Judicial Review in the Polish Competition Law System and the Place for Judicial Deference
The article discusses the effectiveness and the intensity of judicial review in the Polish competition law system. First, it studies whether the judicial review offered by the 1st instance Court of Co...
Editorial foreword
The Editorial Board is pleased to present the 16th volume of the Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies (YARS 2017, 10(16)). This is the only ‘regular’ volume of YARS to be published in 2017 – a second volume, dedi...