The legal positions of ECHR in context of psycological mediation of law

Journal Title: Економіка. Фінанси. Право - Year 2018, Vol 12, Issue

Abstract

The present article deals with the theoretical-legal issuess of using applied provisions of the legal psychology in the work of the European Court of Human Rights (Court). The author analyses the detached decisions of ECHR and its opinions about forensic psychological assessment and psycoligists written explanations. This connection some provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4th November 1950, with the use of opportunities of psychological science and practice are considered. It is alleged that Ukraine is a state based on European experience. It is ECHR practice that gives the key standards for its formation as a rule of in solving sometimes extraordinary, unique legal situations (collisions). Therefore, the gradual adaptation of the practice of ECHR is a necessary process to ensure the rule of the " The European Convention on Human Rights" (1950), which guarantees a msn and a citizen the fundamental rights and freedoms. The author holds that from the standpoint of psychology, the conceptual and terminological construction of "man and citizen" is proportional to the term "personality" having a psychological structure, and, accordingly, its intricacies in the jurisdiction of ECHR. It is emphasized, however, that through the lack of judges, appropriate professional knowledge of psychology ECHR partly assessed such psychological categories as paranoia, phobia, and post-traumatic stress disorder and epilepsy on the basis of a psychiatric component, because of non-appointment of special governmental bodies psychiatric assessment and examination. Consequently the problem of ECHR seems to be caused the inability to differentiate the issues of psychiatry and psychology. It is concluded that the active use of psychological knowledge by ECHR judges dealing with adoption of court decisions will provide a more effective mechanism for handling applicants complaints in respect of privacy-related issues relating to privacy, marriage, sexual relations, compensation for non-pecuniary damage, harsh treatment, person torture etc. Accordingly, it is relevant for ECHR judges to involve psychologists, for example, to assessing the psychological expertise, the psychologist's conclusion, moral hazard etc.

Authors and Affiliations

Ihor Volodymyrovych Ozerskyi

Keywords

Related Articles

Globalization effect on characteristics of human capital

In article the changes in the conditions of social production and labor requirements are analyzed. The evolutionarily changing of scientists views on staff and allocating them specific characteristics that can generate a...

Organizational protection against economic remedies

The main aspects of organizational support for countering economic crimes in the conditions of democratization of national legal proceedings and formation of a new model of functioning of law enforcement bodies of the Eu...

Regulation and control mechanisms of import activity

The article is devoted to the definition of the content of import activities and import operations. The article analyzes the mechanisms of regulation and control of import activities.

Forming business strategies of freight forwarding company in marketing context

The article presents elements of business strategies of freight forwarding companies. The relationship between the mission, goals and strategies of logistics companies and their impact on the market positioning are illus...

Marketing assessment of tourism services' competitiveness

The article proposes a methodology for marketing assessment of the competitiveness of tourism services. This methodology is based on the use of expert survey methods and weighting factors. An important criterion for this...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP531595
  • DOI -
  • Views 63
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ihor Volodymyrovych Ozerskyi (2018). The legal positions of ECHR in context of psycological mediation of law. Економіка. Фінанси. Право, 12(), 23-26. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-531595