The pharmacoeconomic analysis of the pharmacotherapy regimens for the irritable bowel syndrome using the “cost minimization” method

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a clinical pathology accompanied with a significant physical and psychological discomfort, and leading to certain economic losses. Women suffer from IBS 2.2 times more often than men. Aim. To conduct a comparative analysis of drugs recommended for treating patients with IBS by minimizing costs and choosing the treatment regimens allowing to save money with the same efficacy of therapy. Materials and methods. The cost minimization analysis (CMA) of drugs was conducted using data on the cost of drugs for 2018. The course of the primary pharmacotherapy was calculated on the combination of antispasmodic and Loperamide and lasted for 4 weeks (28 days). Results. For the treatment of IBS the combination of a diet, pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy is important. Therefore, for calculation the treatment regimen with two drugs – an antispasmodic and Loperamide was used for IBS with a predominance of diarrhea. After analyzing the cost of treatment regimens we can note that the cheapest regimen with INN Mebeverin was the regimen with drugs Aspasmin and Loperamide hydrochloride. The total cost of the regimen was UAH 287.94. Otilonium bromide is represented by only one TN, and the final price of the treatment regimen with this drug depends on Loperamide. The treatment regimen with Loperamide hydrochloride of the Ukrainian production (UAH 320.65 per course) appeared to be cheaper. The cheapest treatment regimen with Drotaverin was the one with two drugs of domestic production – NO-KH-SHA® and Loperamide hydrochloride (141.01 UAH). Conclusions. It has been determined that the difference in costs for different treatment regimen depends on the price of drugs, as well as on whether it is generic or original (brand), imported or domestic drug. Most domestic drugs are generic; therefore, the treatment regimens will be cheaper and will help to save money.

Authors and Affiliations

D. V. Zakorko, T. O. Baglay

Keywords

Related Articles

The pharmacoeconomic analysis of medicines affecting the bone structure and mineralization

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic disease of bones and is characterized by decrease of bone strength, which leads to a high risk of fractures. The seriousness of this disease is in its prolonged asymptomatic cour...

The study of the antiulcer effect of the lyophilized extract of fireweed herb on the model of ethanol-prednisolone stomach damage in rats

Peptic ulcer disease therapy includes schemes for the use of a number of drugs; most of them are synthetic with many side effects and contraindications. Therefore, the search for alternative herbal medicines with the ant...

Дослідження бронхолітичної дії екстракту «Бронхостен»

Незважаючи на чималі сучасні досягнуті успіхи у профілактиці та лікуванні гострих респіраторних захворювань, їх частка у загальній структурі інфекційних захворювань сягає 90–95 %. Тому питання створення нових лікарських...

Вивчення противиразкової дії ліофілізованого екстракту трави хамерію вузьколистого на моделі етанол-преднізолонового ураження шлунка у щурів

Терапія виразкової хвороби включає схеми використання ряду лікарських засобів, більшість з яких є синтетичними з великою кількістю побічних ефектів і протипоказань. Тому пошук альтернативних засобів рослинного походження...

The frequency and VEN-analysis of pharmacotherapy in children with ARVI in the healthcare institution of the Poltava region

Acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) are diseases that have important medico-social importance since they are associated with a wide distribution among the population, the risk of complications, reduced quality of l...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP657958
  • DOI 10.24959/cphj.19.1496
  • Views 94
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

D. V. Zakorko, T. O. Baglay (2019). The pharmacoeconomic analysis of the pharmacotherapy regimens for the irritable bowel syndrome using the “cost minimization” method. Клінічна фармація; Клиническая фармация, 23(2), 60-64. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-657958