THE POWER OF A SYMBOL
Journal Title: Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The question "What is character?" has long discussed in philosophy. As a result, there are two types of concepts about character. According to one of these ideas symbol corresponds harmonious reality (positive concept). According to another – the idea of a character refers to fragmented, chaotic reality (negative concept). There have been attempts to create a theory of character that would conflict of concepts. The purpose of this work is to explore the power of a character from a philosophical point of view, to prove that the character has real power over the individual and society as a whole. Methods. This paper was used the methods of analysis and synthesis. Analysis of recent studies has shown that the psychologists and psychiatrists (Freud, Jung, Fromm) were first, who talking about power of the character. There are contemporary works that focus on particular character authorities a certain society. Some philosophers even identify the character and a power. So the question of power symbol in the philosophy remains open. Results. The symbol can be terrible destructive force. Symbols are the carrier sense dictates that history, human memory. Not every accident occurs as destruction of cultural destruction memory. The individual, attributing itself to a particular group, it selects based on their own ideas about a good and an evil, a honor and a dishonor, a fame and a shame. A symbol is a sign of solidarity with this group. The symbol may be involved in the semiotic connections: it can insult or praise. The symbolic world is protecting people from their existential fears and uncertainty. There are formed two opposing camps; each of them by protecting certain characters defends its identity. The originality of this work lies in the fact that is considered the power of a symbol as a philosophical category in her determined features of formation of the government. Conclusion. Thus it can be concluded that the symbol is two-faced Janus. One with sides, the characters appear in the capable hands as a means of manipulating the masses, and with holds that dictates standards of conduct and the impact on people's lives with different. In this case, the symbolic power is a power regulator of human behavior, character over the minds of people. The symbolic power has influence on the individual and society as a whole.
Authors and Affiliations
Hanna FANDEJEVA
AESTHETIC CONTENT OF CATEGORIES "POETIC" – "PROSE"
Traditional studies of art that were built art history and aesthetic logic of the artistic process, presently complemented by consideration of the latter in the context of culture. Relevance of the study of art requires...
THOMAS AQUINAS ON CREATION EX NIHILO AND GENERATION OF A HUMAN
Introduction. The article is dedicated to the issue of generation in Thomistic philosophy as a result of a union between Christianity with its creeds of creation as it is described in the Holly Scripture, and ancient phi...
THE FIGURE OF SILENCE AND PHILOSOPHEME OF MEMORY IN THE WORK OF G. S. SKOVORODA AND MODERN TRADITION
Introduction. The urgency of the topic of the article is determined by the search for modern philosophy, social and political philosophy in the domain of genesis, the establishment and functioning of the fundamental axio...
PHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION BY LUCIANO FLORIDI – RELEVANCE OF INFORMATION ETHICS AND METHOD OF LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION
Introduction. The article tackles the question of correlation between philosophy and digital ICTs (information and communication technologies), the transformation of human mind and self-perception by virtual reality and...
МЕDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF МЕDIA-АRCHEOLOGY AND VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY
Introduction. In the era of Post-Present, media are a universal characteristic of preserving and transmission of information, creating a new reality, since radically changing both perception and communication links. In t...