The presence of LUTS is not a decisive tool for deciding who should be qualified for prostate biopsy

Journal Title: Central European Journal of Urology - Year 2014, Vol 67, Issue 2

Abstract

Editorial.

Authors and Affiliations

Kajetan Juszczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay

Introduction We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing pos...

Role of morphometry and proliferative parameters in grading of urothelial neoplasms

Introduction Mean nuclear area of 10 nuclei (MNA–10), mitotic activity index (MAI) and Ki–67 are highly reproducible and can be routinely used as adjuncts to histopathological grading in classifying tumors. Assays of th...

Timing of radical cystectomy in Central Europe – multicenter study on factors influencing the time from diagnosis to radical treatment of bladder cancer patients

Introduction Time that passes between an unfavourable diagnosis to a radical cystectomy (RC) affects oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. Unsatisfactory survival of patients after RC in Central Europe ca...

Cystolithiasis in women as a distant complication after minimal invasive treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Introduction Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a condition of social dimension which generally pertains to women of various age. The only effective treatments of SUI are surgical procedures. The use of tension-free va...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP341317
  • DOI 10.5173/ceju.2014.02.art12
  • Views 40
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kajetan Juszczak (2014). The presence of LUTS is not a decisive tool for deciding who should be qualified for prostate biopsy. Central European Journal of Urology, 67(2), 182-183. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-341317