The Pros and Cons of Using Personal Response Systems in an Interactive Scientific Debate

Journal Title: Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science - Year 2017, Vol 19, Issue 2

Abstract

Aims: To assess the suitability of personal response system (PRS) clickers as an audience engagement tool to make conference debates a more interactive learning experience. Study Design: We studied the suitability of PRS to moderate and compile data on a scientific debate that was the centerpiece of an international conference. The debate explored the issues pertaining to the introduction of Genetically-Modified (GM) foods into Europe and involved a panel of some of the world's leading scientific authorities on this subject. Methodology: 173 delegates were issued with PRS handsets and audience demography was collected immediately prior to debate commencement. The audience was polled on their opinion on the debate motion during the event and PRS was used to instantly screen poll results and changes in inter-poll opinions to the audience. Results: (i) Pros: PRS effectively controlled debate timings, rendered the event interactive stimulating audience engagement, compiled the respondents’ opinions on GM foods and instantly screened polling results as a percent frequency histogram to the audience. The technology highlighted a clear shift in audience opinion from “Neutral” before the debate to a two-fold increase in the anti-GM group after the event which created a novel engaging experience for the delegates. (ii) Cons: Inefficient collection of the audience polling responses was observed exemplified by 36.1% of responses to poll questions not being recorded and only 10.4% of the audience submitted a full set of poll results (7 demographic multiple choice questions (MCQ) and 3 debate polls). Conclusion: To the best of the authors’ knowledge no studies have been published to date concerning the use of PRS to facilitate an interactive debate. The immediacy of the PRS enhanced the event by prompting discussion among delegates, which would not have happened had they not known which direction other delegates were leaning on the debate question. The PRS aided in controlling the debate timings and producing instant graphical feedback but was less efficient in the collection of the complete audience dataset.

Authors and Affiliations

O. Kavanagh, S. Jones

Keywords

Related Articles

Implications of Hawking Activities on the Kumasi Campus of University of Education, Winneba

Street vending or hawking has become an important economic activity highly patronized by persons with limited educational and professional training especially in developing countries. It is characterized by traders trans...

Creating a Practicing Muslim: A Study of Qawmi Madrasah in Bangladesh

This research aims at identifying teaching and learning approach adopted by the Qawmi Madrasahs of Bangladesh. The focus of teaching and learning system is a fundamental issue in Qawmi Madrasah as it is a faith-based Isl...

Research Findings for Sleep Disorders: A Literature Update

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention long-term sleep difficulties are reported by 50 to 70 million individuals in the U.S. population. These difficulties include a variety of symptoms that effect an...

Resilience Potential of Autistic Children’s Parents and Its Relationship to Family Functioning and Acceptance of Disability

Resilience, understood here as the way that parents cope with the vulnerability situation of having a child with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), gains importance when experiencing negativity in the family, school and so...

The Social Control Exerted by Advertising: A Study on the Perception of Greenwashing in Green Products at Retail

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the perception of greenwashing in the beliefs, attitudes and the perceived benefits by consumers to green products at retail facing the social control exert...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP320951
  • DOI 10.9734/BJESBS/2017/31348
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

O. Kavanagh, S. Jones (2017). The Pros and Cons of Using Personal Response Systems in an Interactive Scientific Debate. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 19(2), 1-11. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-320951