THE REFERENDUM, REFLECTED IN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S CASE LAW

Abstract

The referendum is the main instrument of direct democracy, a means of consultation by which the People has the possibility to directly exercise national sovereignty. In Romania, the referendum has to be organized every time the Constitution is subject to a revision, regardless of who has initiated it, and also when the dismissal of Romanian President is at stake. The result of the valid referendum cannot be disregarded in these two cases. So, this kind of referendum is compulsory both in what concerns its organization and its outcome. There is also a so-called consultative referendum, which is organized at the national level at the request of the President of Romania, who may ask the Romanian citizens to express their will as to questions of national interest. This one is optional from both fore-mentioned points of view: its necessity and its result. The Constitutional Court of Romania supervises the observance of the procedure for the organization and carrying out of a referendum, and it confirms its results. The referendum was a pretty controversial issue in Romania in the context of political changes that lead in 2012 to the suspension of the President of Romania and it continues to stir the feelings of the political stage in connexion with further intended amendment of the Basic Law. The present paper aims to depict the importance of the case law of the Constitutional Court concerning the referendum, as a guardian of constitutional democracy that renders compulsory decisions on the compatibility with constitutional principles and the rule of law of actions taken by the Government and the Parliament of Romania in respect of other State institutions. In this regard, it strongly recommended to the State’s institutions to engage in a loyal co-operation between themselves.

Authors and Affiliations

Valentina BĂRBĂȚEANU

Keywords

Related Articles

THE USE WITHOUT RIGHT OF THE PRIVILEGED INFORMATION (INSIDE TRADING) – OFFENSE REGARDING THE CAPITAL MARKET

This study addresses the particularly complex problem caused by one of the offense that can be committed in the capital market. Naturally, the article also includes an introductory analysis of the field and the regulatio...

REVIEW OF IRRECONCILABLE DECISIONS

This article proposes a theoretical and practical approach of the review case which refers to the hypothesis in which two final decisions cannot be reconciled. The author is making an analysis even by the reference to tw...

THE EVOLUTION OF E-COMMERCE IN ROMANIA

The evolution of e-commerce in Romania in the past few years was significant and in 2016 the total amount of money spent on online shopping exceeded 1.8 billion Euros. Since it is believed that e-commerce will be the fut...

UNHCR AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ROLE AND THEIR JOINT EFFORTS IN TACKLING THE EUROPEAN REFUGEE CRISIS FROM IT`S INCEPTION UNTIL PRESENT TIMES

In this study we will analyse UNHCR and Non-Governmental Organizations role and their joint efforts in tackling the European refugee crisis from it`s inception until present times. Their work is extremely important becau...

ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF DEFENSE IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL

One of the fundamental principles of the criminal trial is the principle of enforcing the right of defense, being not only an expression of the rule of law, but also a necessary condition for the efficient course of just...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP304155
  • DOI -
  • Views 115
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Valentina BĂRBĂȚEANU (2018). THE REFERENDUM, REFLECTED IN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S CASE LAW. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 418-429. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-304155