The Regional competition for the leadership of the Middle East region (Yet “leadership” is a highly subjective word. What kind of “leadership?” and from whose perspective?)

Journal Title: Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 3

Abstract

Two of the dominant themes of discussion in international relations scholarship over the last decade have been global governance and rising powers. Underlying both discussions are profound ethical questions about how the world should be ordered, who is responsible for addressing global problems, how change can be managed, and how global governance can be made to work for peoples in developing as well as developed states. Specially the Middle East. Yet, these are often not addressed or only briefly mentioned as ethical dilemmas by commentators. Never have so many crises engulfed the Middle East at the same time. From the rise of Islamic State in Iraq and the civil wars in Libya, Syria, and Yemen, to the deteriorating security situation in Egypt, the region is in an unprecedented state of flux. At the same time, there is a deep feeling among many Arab states that the United States has lost interest in, if not effectively withdrawn from, the region. For Gulf States in particular there is a fear that Washington has struck a Faustian bargain with Tehran, ceding it regional primacy in return for a nuclear agreement. The region of the Middle East is highly conflict-loaded. The absence of one distinct regional power may be considered both cause and consequence of this structural feature. At the same time, there are significant power gaps between states in the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel and Iran among the most powerful actors and accordingly defined as a potential regional power. Due to the specific empirical setting of the Middle East region, an analytical design emphasizing relational and procedural dynamics is required. In attempting to develop such a design, this paper utilizes three well-established schools of thought of international relations: (neo) realism, institutionalism, and constructivism. These three schools of thought are further used for developing hypotheses on both Arab regional policy and its effects on the Middle East. After illustrating these hypotheses in relation to four periods in the contemporary history of Arabs in Middle East, theoretical lessons to be learned for the analysis of regional powers in other world areas are presented. Keywords: Middle East, potential regional power, leadership, competition.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Mohammad Salim Al-Rawashdeh,

Keywords

Related Articles

Integrated Transport System for Kerman City in Iran - Key Success Factors

Abstract: Transportation is an essential part for all our lives. Providing the same by the authority and availing the service by the people depends upon the capacity to provide and demand by the city in turn the people,...

Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Belongingness Motive

Abstract: Belongingness is the human drive to form positive and lasting interpersonal relationships and ultimately to be a part of a social group environment.The purpose of this study was to develop a valid, reliable ins...

Reproduction and Contradiction of Cultural and Political Ideologies in Education

The role of education in the reproduction of the social relations of production, control and division of labour cannot be negated. School systems may reproduce class and status relations. It is in this context that this...

Stress in Pregnant Women: A Psychological Study

Abstract: The changed socio economic conditions have widened opportunities for women’s education and employment and have provided them with new avenues to express and asert their equality. By working outside the home wom...

Miracles and Power Encounters in Mark 4: 35-40 and 5:1-20 in The Context of Deliverance Ministries in Nigerian Churches

Miracles and Power encounters are examined and found to be indispensable in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. His birth, life and ministry are all surrounded, inevitably by miracles and power encounters. The study p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP378562
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Mohammad Salim Al-Rawashdeh, (2016). The Regional competition for the leadership of the Middle East region (Yet “leadership” is a highly subjective word. What kind of “leadership?” and from whose perspective?). Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 176-192. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-378562