The relationship between free will and causal determinism in the views of analytic philosophers

Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2016, Vol 48, Issue 96

Abstract

Are free will and causal determinism compatible with each other? This is one of the most important questions central to discussions relating to free will. The problem is that causal determinism makes us encounter challenging dilemmas, either way leading us to deny free will: (1) causal determinism is either true or not true; (2) if causal determinism is true, we do not have free will; since all of our actions (including free will), in that case, will be the inevitable results of their former causes; (3) if causal determinism is not true, we do not have free will; since all of the events will be accidental and thus cannot be attributed to a performer; (4) hence, we do not have free will. In response to these two extremes, one should either show that either one of the statements (2) or (3) is false, or instead deny free will. Looking back at the issues discussed by contemporary analytic philosophers on this question, the present paper aims to categorize and briefly introduce those views. And finally, the attitudes and views of Western philosophers are compared with those of Islamic thinkers, and the differences and similarities between them are examined

Authors and Affiliations

Jafar Morvarid, Ruhollah Movahedi

Keywords

Related Articles

Cosmological Argument in the West

Cosmological argument has been one of the most significant philosophical and theological arguments in religious traditions of different religions. In the western Theo-philosophical tradition, there have been both differe...

Mind from the perspective of Avicenna

“Mind” is among the words frequently used in the works of Muslim philosophers, including Avicenna; however, a positive meaning can hardly be elucidated from it. Given the type of applications of this word in the works of...

Rational Method and Philosophical Trend in Ṣadr al-Muti’allihīn's Interpretation of the Qur'an

Although the present article addresses a philosopher interpreter, but it is to say that Ṣadr al-Muti’allihīn's exegetical method is comprehensive and that he has made use of rational, traditional, and intuitive methods i...

Elucidation in Natural Sciences

In this article, after an introduction, two more or less detailed reports of history of science – from the realm of medical science – are provided to clarify that when the scientists face a problem, how they practically...

The Status and Philosophy of Theology in the Realm of Ghazālī’s Thought

Although Ghazālī has not openly talked about the philosophy of theology, its components can be found in his works. As such, he regards the ultimate goal of theology to be safeguarding the religion and the assertoric or i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP204725
  • DOI 10.22067/philosophy.v48i1.45411
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jafar Morvarid, Ruhollah Movahedi (2016). The relationship between free will and causal determinism in the views of analytic philosophers. جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام, 48(96), 85-102. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-204725