The use of one-dimensional pain tool assessment – review of the literature

Journal Title: Rehabilitacja Medyczna - Year 2014, Vol 18, Issue 2

Abstract

An effective and, more importantly, reliable measurement of pain has always been a difficult task, mainly due to the availability of only a subjective evaluation of pain. However, an accurate estimation of the sensation is extremely useful in the healing process, and it can determine the effectiveness of treatment. The multitude of different types of pain rating scales found in scientific research inspires re­flections on their quality and possible use in the processes of both therapy and research. The aim of this paper is to present one-dimen­sional pain assessment scales, showing their advantages and disadvantages with respect to criteria such as age, cultural background, pain type, disorder type, and the ease of application and interpretation, as well as to try to select the best one from the scales listed. This pa­per also aims to present possible modifications of pain rating scales that have appeared in recent years as new measurement tools used in scientific research on the subjective assessment of pain. All articles were found via the EBSCO HOST website. Only English-language literature was taken into consideration; only those articles where it was possible to view their full text were taken into consideration. The individual search tags used were as follows: ‘pain measurement tool’, ‘pain scale’ and ‘NRS scale’. The last criterion was adopted be­cause the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is the most commonly used scale in research on the method of measuring pain, regardless of pain type, severity, cause, or duration. The literature complied for this paper was published between 1979 and 2013. The articles analysed indicate that each of the pain rating scales listed could be a reliable measurement tool. However, the highest rated and the most com­monly used scales are NRS and FPS (Face Pain Scale – pain assessment scale using facial images). It should be emphasized that only the appropriately matched tools for measuring pain intensity, tailored to a research group, shall determine the effectiveness of the research.

Authors and Affiliations

Przemysław Filipczyk, Dawid Kasolik, Edward Saulicz, Jerzy Rottermund

Keywords

Related Articles

Knowledge of the factors inducing lymphedema and compliance with preventive recommendations in mastectomy patients

Background: Lymphedema is a clinical manifestation of lymphatic system insufficiency. The risk of lymphedema increases especially in the case of women after mastectomy with removal of axilla lymph nodes and post-surgical...

Wpływ urazu kręgosłupa powikłanego zaburzeniami neurologicznymi na funkcje seksualne – dysfunkcje seksualne u kobiet

Patofizjologia zaburzeń seksualnych u kobiet po urazie kręgosłupa powikłanego zaburzeniami neurologicznymi (UKPZN) jest trudnym obiektem badań i jest rzadziej opisywana niż analogiczne zaburzenia u mężczyzn. Istnieje nie...

The importance of interpersonal communication in the process of rehabilitation. Review article

In this paper the problem of interpersonal communication between the patient and the physiotherapist along with its implications for the process of physiotherapy are presented. The main goal of the present article is to...

Typy klawiatur wybranych urządzeń elektronicznych, a występowanie dolegliwości bólowych obręczy barkowej i kończyny górnej - przegląd piśmiennictwa

Wstęp: W dzisiejszych czasach komputery, telefony osobiste (smartfony) i inne urządzenia elektroniczne znajdują szerokie zastosowane w wielu dziedzinach życia codziennego, przez co stały się wręcz niezbędnymi narzędziami...

Lower-limb ooedema during pregnancy

Lower-limb oedemas can be the result of abnormalities in the structure and functioning of the lymphatic system, injuries or inflammation, or can be related to cancer and its treatment; however, they are more often one of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP77677
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Przemysław Filipczyk, Dawid Kasolik, Edward Saulicz, Jerzy Rottermund (2014). The use of one-dimensional pain tool assessment – review of the literature. Rehabilitacja Medyczna, 18(2), 23-30. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-77677