TO BE OR NOT TO BE: AN INFORMATIVE NON-SYMBOLIC NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE PROCESSING STUDY ABOUT SMALL VERSUS LARGE NUMBERS IN INFANTS

Journal Title: Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation - Year 2014, Vol 15, Issue 1

Abstract

Many studies tested the association between numerical magnitude processing and mathematical achievement with conflicting findings reported for individuals with mathematical learning disorders. Some of the inconsistencies might be explained by the number of non-symbolic stimuli or dot collections used in studies. It has been hypothesized that there is an object-file system for ‘small’ and an analogue magnitude system for ‘large’ numbers. This two-system account has been supported by the set size limit of the object-file system (three items). A boundary was defined, accordingly, categorizing numbers below four as ‘small’ and from four and above as ‘large’. However, data on ‘small’ number processing and on the ‘boundary’ between small and large numbers are missing. In this contribution we provide data from infants discriminating between the number sets 4 vs. 8 and 1 vs. 4, both containing the number four combined with a small and a large number respectively. Participants were 25 and 26 full term 9-month-olds for 4 vs. 8 and 1 vs. 4 respectively. The stimuli (dots) were controlled for continuous variables. Eye-tracking was combined with the habituation paradigm. The results showed that the infants were successful in discriminating 1 from 4, but failed to discriminate 4 from 8 dots. This finding supports the assumption of the number four as a ‘small’ number and enlarges the object-file system’s limit. This study might help to explain inconsistencies in studies. Moreover, the information may be useful in answering parent’s questions about challenges that vulnerable children with number processing problems, such as children with mathematical learning disorders, might encounter. In addition, the study might give some information on the stimuli that can be used to effectively foster children’s magnitude processing skills.

Authors and Affiliations

Annelies CEULEMANS| Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Developmental Disorders, Ghent University, Tom LOEYS| Department of Data-analysis, Ghent University, Karel HOPPENBROUWERS| Centre for Youth Health Care, Catholic University of Louvain, Annemie DESOETE| Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Developmental Disorders, Ghent University and Artevelde University College Ghent, Belgium

Keywords

Related Articles

APHASIA AND MENINGOENCEPHALITIS – A CASE STUDY

PURPOSE: This study is directed to examine aphasia caused by meningoencephalitis, with emphasis on reading and writing. METHODS: Some tasks from reading and writing subtest of Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE)...

AUTISM AND PERVASIVE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS - Vladimir E. Trajkovski

In the last six decades, the autism has arisen significant interest among doctors and researchers. Great achievements have been made in this field of study, in order to help understand this intriguing disorder. However,...

CELEBRATED APRIL 2nd – INTERNATIONAL DAY OF PERSONS WITH AUTISM

On April 2nd, the Macedonian Scientific Society for Autism, for the fourth time organized an event on the occasion of the International Day of Persons with Autism. The event with cultural and artistic character was held...

AN EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF HEARING IMPAIRED CHILDREN ATTENDING SPECIAL SCHOOLS IN THE SERBIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM

Quality of life is vague and difficult to define, since individual goals, in addition to economic, cultural, religious and educational factors, also have a dominant influence. This study is aimed to determine the differe...

OVERPROTECTION AND ADOLESCENTS WITH PHYISICAL DISABILITIES

The article deals with the effects of overprotection on the care and development of children with physical disabilities. The focus is on the profes­sional work of carers caring for young people with physical disabilities...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP7941
  • DOI -
  • Views 485
  • Downloads 37

How To Cite

Annelies CEULEMANS, Tom LOEYS, Karel HOPPENBROUWERS, Annemie DESOETE (2014). TO BE OR NOT TO BE: AN INFORMATIVE NON-SYMBOLIC NUMERICAL MAGNITUDE PROCESSING STUDY ABOUT SMALL VERSUS LARGE NUMBERS IN INFANTS. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 75-90. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-7941