Treatment with Muḥarramāt (Forbidden Things)

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2014, Vol 46, Issue 97

Abstract

The jurists have since early times wondered whether illnesses can be treated with forbidden or ḥarām things and thereby improve the illness and restore the patients to health; or whether it is totally forbidden and impermissible to step into this arena even if motivated by treatment of illness. Of course, using the unlawful in treating illnesses where exploitations other than eating and drinking is in mind is not so much problematic and sensitive; however, what is more open to disputation is eating and drinking unlawful things with the intention of treatment. In this respect, although most of the jurists, especially the earlier ones, have viewed treatment with the unlawful, either absolutely or with certain muḥarramāt as impermissible and have not withstood it, the viewpoint addressed in this article is the permissibility of all kinds of treatment with all muḥarramāt irrespective of their differences. Thus, in order to explain this viewpoint and reinforce it, five reasons have been set forth and by providing the conditions and answering to the contradictory probabilities and criticizing the opponents’ viewpoints, it is tried to pave the ground to some extent for the acceptability of this theory.

Authors and Affiliations

Akbar AḥMadpūR

Keywords

Related Articles

Theory of Social Understanding of Statutes; Principles, Application

The theory of Muḥammad Jawād Mughniya entitled “social understanding of statutes”, is the evolved mechanism for the refinement of the basis of a ruling (tanqīḥ-i manāṭ) in legal reasoning (ijtihād) process, which has bee...

A Deliberation on the Quiddity of Aṣli Muḥriz (Confirming Principle)

The characteristic of denotation (imāra) is its typical speculative exposition (kāshifiyyat), for which the legislator devises validity in respect to this characteristic. In contrast to it is the practical principle that...

Study of the Precondition for the Contemporaneity of the Attitude of the Intellectual with the Era of the Infallibles (Study of the Ways to Generalize the Authenticity of the Attitude of the Intellectual to the Newly-Appeared Attitudes)

The famous theory concerning the meaning and interpretation of text is called "intentionalism" which says: “The meaning or interpretation of a work is related to the intention of the creator of the work or is delimited a...

A Critique on the Legal Theory of the Sufficiency of Swearing Fifty Oaths by the Claimant in Qasāma (Compurgation) (The Legal Principles of Article 377 of the Penal Code Bill of 1390 sh/2011)

Qasāma is one of the proofs for homicide, which will be reliable in case of the existence of lawth (strong suspicion). There are two major views on how it is implemented. In sum, the first view deems as necessary swearin...

The Role of Verity Proposition in Principles of Jurisprudence

The dynamism of the verity proposition has led to its being used in various issues and sciences as the founder for the general and constant principles. The principles of jurisprudence, as a science that is the founder fo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP184514
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v46i17.19251
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Akbar AḥMadpūR (2014). Treatment with Muḥarramāt (Forbidden Things). فقه و اصول, 46(97), 29-54. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-184514