UNDERSTANDING CONATIVE REGULATION SYSTEMS – AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OFFENDERS AND NON-OFFENDERS

Journal Title: Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation - Year 2016, Vol 17, Issue 1

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous studies confirmed personality traits as being important predictors of criminal behavior. The aim of this research was to determine which constellation of basic personality traits incarcerated individuals and those serving alternative sanctions differ, and which traits make the difference between the criminal and the non-criminal populations. In this research, the model of personality used is a cybernetic model of conative functioning, which assumes that conative regulation systems almost completely describe the structure of personality. Methods: The study sample consisted of 391 male respondents (152 offenders serving prison sentence, 91 convicts sentenced to alternative penalties and 148 non-offenders). Examined variables were: the regulator of activity (Extroversion), the regulator of organic functions (Hysteria), the regulator of defense reactions (Anxiety), the regulator of attack reactions (Aggressiveness), the system for coordination of regulatory functions (Psychoticism) and the system for integration of regulatory functions (Integration). Results: There were significant differences in all dimensions of personality between groups, except for the framework of Extraversion. The traits that contribute to the difference between individuals serving prison sentence and offenders sentenced to alternative penalties are Integration and Aggressiveness. The traits that contribute to the difference between non-offenders and offenders serving prison sentence are Psychoticism, Integration, Aggressiveness, and Anxiety. Among offenders sentenced to alternative penalties and the general population no difference in personality traits was found. Conclusion: Our findings may indicate the need for mandatory diagnostic psychological evaluation of persons who have committed minor offenses, to ensure the right decision is made when choosing between prison and an alternative method of punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Sanja DJURDJEVIC| Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, Zilijeta KRIVOKAPIC| 2High Medical School of Professional Studies, Сuprija, Serbia, Rosa SHAPIС| University of Bjeljina, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sreten VICENTIC| Clinic of Psychiatry, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Keywords

Related Articles

PHYSICAL DISABILITY AND DRAMA ACTIVITY

Drama activity presents a great challenge for ado­lescents with physical disabilities, and at the same time it provides them with much experience for life. Adolescents are educated through theatrical activ­ity; they tes...

ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF COMMUNICATION AMONG PERSONS WITH APHASIA

The aphasia is the most complicated and the most difficult form of disorder of speaking and language. Most often it appears as a consequence of a brain stroke. The occurrence of aphasias is in about one third of the...

THE SPEECH OF THE CHILDREN WITH DOwn SyndromE

In this paper, besides the physical characteristics of the children with this syndrome, and by this research are given more indications for the speech deficiency and the development of the speech of the children with Dow...

STATE OF ARTICULATION OF THE HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN AT PRESCHOOL AGE FROM I TO IV GROUP ACCORDING TO KOSTIC, WHICH ARE ACCEPTED BY REHABILITATION

In this work are presented the results of the author’s researches which subject is: the state of the speech voices of the preschool children with auditory handicap from I to IV group according to Costic which are accepte...

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO, BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Given the increased pressure on educational system in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) to fully embrace inclusive education and to provide appropriate supports to all students, there was a need for establishing a new departm...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP7985
  • DOI -
  • Views 491
  • Downloads 35

How To Cite

Sanja DJURDJEVIC, Zilijeta KRIVOKAPIC, Rosa SHAPIС, Sreten VICENTIC (2016). UNDERSTANDING CONATIVE REGULATION SYSTEMS – AN EXAMINATION OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OFFENDERS AND NON-OFFENDERS. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 66-84. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-7985