Using metacognitive cues to infer others’ thinking
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 4
Abstract
Three studies tested whether people use cues about the way other people think—for example, whether others respond fast vs. slow—to infer what responses other people might give to reasoning problems. People who solve reasoning problems using deliberative thinking have better insight than intuitive problem-solvers into the responses that other people might give to the same problems. Presumably because deliberative responders think of intuitive responses before they think of deliberative responses, they are aware that others might respond intuitively, particularly in circumstances that hinder deliberative thinking (e.g., fast responding). Intuitive responders, on the other hand, are less aware of alternative responses to theirs, so they infer that other people respond as they do, regardless of the way others respond.
Authors and Affiliations
André Mata and Tiago Almeida
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678134
- DOI -
- Views 126
- Downloads 0
Weighing waiting: The influence of information certainty and delay penalty on waiting for noninstrumental information
People have been shown to delay decision making to wait for missing noninstrumental attribute information — information that would not have altered their decision if known at the outset — with this delay originally attri...
Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion
Unstructured interviews are a ubiquitous tool for making screening decisions despite a vast literature suggesting that they have little validity. We sought to establish reasons why people might persist in the illusion th...
Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times
Revealed preference is the dominant approach for inferring preferences, but it is limited in that it relies solely on discrete choice data. When a person chooses one alternative over another, we cannot infer the strength...
External validity of individual differences in multiple cue probability learning: The case of pilot training
Individuals differ in their ability to deal with unpredictable environments. Could impaired performances on learning an unpredictable cue-criteria relationship in a laboratory task be associated with impaired learning of...
Introducing money at any time can reduce discounting in intertemporal choices with rewards: An extension of the upfront money effect
To study intertemporal choices, researchers typically instruct subjects to choose between smaller and sooner (SS) and larger and later (LL) rewards (e.g., gaining CNY 210 in a week vs. gaining CNY 250 in five weeks). Peo...