What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 6
Abstract
A recent survey of inequality (Norton and Ariely, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12) asked respondents to indicate what percent of the nation’s total wealth is—and should be—controlled by richer and poorer quintiles of the U.S. population. We show that such measures lead to powerful anchoring effects that account for the otherwise remarkable findings that respondents reported perceiving, and desiring, extremely low inequality in wealth. We show that the same anchoring effects occur in other domains, namely web page popularity and school teacher salaries. We introduce logically equivalent questions about average levels of inequality that lead to more accurate responses. Finally, when we made respondents aware of the logical connection between the two measures, the majority said that typical responses to the average measures, indicating higher levels of inequality, better reflected their actual perceptions and preferences than did typical responses to percent measures.
Authors and Affiliations
Kimmo Eriksson and Brent Simpson
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678030
- DOI -
- Views 139
- Downloads 0
The application of Dempster-Shafer theory demonstrated with justification provided by legal evidence
In forecasting and decision making, people can and often do represent a degree of belief in some proposition. At least two separate constructs capture such degrees of belief: likelihoods capturing evidential balance and...
The devil you know: The effect of brand recognition and product ratings on consumer choice
Previous research on the role of recognition in decision-making in inferential choice has focussed on the Recognition Heuristic (RH), which proposes that in situations where recognition is predictive of a decision criter...
Decision-making styles and depressive symptomatology: Development of the Decision Styles Questionnaire
Difficulty making decisions is one of the symptoms of the depressive illness. Previous research suggests that depressed individuals may make decisions that differ from those made by the non-depressed, and that they use s...
Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study
In “The value of nothing: asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making” Read, Olivola and Hardisty (2017) proposed an asymmetric subjective opportunity cost (ASOC) effect to explain and...
The role of process data in the development and testing of process models of judgment and decision making
The aim of this article is to evaluate the contribution of process tracing data to the development and testing of models of judgment and decision making (JDM). We draw on our experience of editing the “Handbook of proces...