Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 6

Abstract

Sunk costs have been known to elicit violations of expected utility theory, in particular, the independence or cancellation axiom. Separately, violations of the stochastic dominance principle have been demonstrated in various settings despite the fact that descriptive models of choice favored in economics deem such violations irrational. However, it is currently unknown whether sunk costs also yield stochastic dominance violations. In two studies using a tri-colored roulette wheel choice task with non-equiprobable events yet equal payoffs, we observed that those who had sunk costs selected a stochastically dominated option significantly more than did those who had no costs. Moreover, a second study revealed that people chose a stochastically dominated option significantly more when the expected value was low compared to high. A model comparison of psychological explanations demonstrated that theories that incorporate a reference shift of the status quo could predict these sunk cost-based violations of stochastic dominance whereas other models could not.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryan K. Jessup, Lily B. Assaad and Katherine Wick

Keywords

Related Articles

Cognitive ability and risk aversion: A systematic review and meta analysis

Are highly intelligent people less risk averse? Over the last two decades scholars have argued the existence of a negative relationship between cognitive ability and risk aversion. Although numerous studies support this,...

Learning to communicate risk information in groups

Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, & Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability est...

Think or blink — is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy?

Several approaches to judgment and decision making emphasize the effort-reducing properties of heuristics. One prominent example for effort-reduction is the recognition heuristic (RH) which proposes that judgments are ma...

Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens’ judgment of performance information

Numerical performance information is increasingly important to political decision-making in the public sector. Some have suggested that biases in citizens’ processing of numerical information can be exploited by politici...

Wording effects in moral judgments

As the study of moral judgments grows, it becomes imperative to compare results across studies in order to create unified theories within the field. These efforts are potentially undermined, however, by variations in wor...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678386
  • DOI -
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryan K. Jessup, Lily B. Assaad and Katherine Wick (2018). Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(6), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678386