Wind speed, wind yaw and the aerodynamic drag acting on a bicycle and rider

Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2015, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

A large portion of a cyclist’s power is consumed by air drag. Opposing force power meters measure air drag with a wind sensor. In cross winds the bicycle and rider experience a different air drag than that informed by a conventional wind sensor. The main objective of this study is to quantify this error as a function of wind yaw. Additionally, if power is independently measured with a direct force power meter, we estimate the drag area (CdA) as a function of wind yaw without using a yaw sensor. 1- We use exact equations to estimate air drag from airspeed and wind yaw instead of approximate equations and a conventional wind sensor that responds to the axial component of the airspeed called inline airspeed. 2- We describe a novel method for estimating air drag using a conventional wind sensor under naturally-occurring wind conditions, where the missing wind yaw data is inferred from ground speed, heading and the prevailing wind velocity. The prevailing wind is identified as a vector by analyzing ground speed, inline air speed and heading data. Wind yaw that is estimated by this method is called the virtual wind yaw. Our test results suggest that a state-of-the-art opposing force power meter, namely the iBike Newton, systematically underreports the total power when the wind yaw is large. We show that the virtual wind yaw approximation often returns a more accurate estimate of instantaneous power than a conventional opposing force power meter. When a bicycle is equipped with a speedometer, an inclinometer, a conventional wind sensor and a direct force power meter, the redundancy in the data allows us to determine the constituent components of the total power including the aerodynamic power. It also allows us to determine the CdA as a function of wind yaw, as well as the time and energy spent within a given range of wind yaw angles. The accuracy of an opposing force power meter can be improved by using exact equations with input from a wind yaw sensor (e.g., a wind vane).

Authors and Affiliations

Osman Isvan| Center Avenue, 1210. Aptos, CA, 95003, USA

Keywords

Related Articles

Qualitative body composition of cyclists: bioimpedance vector analysis discriminates different categories of cyclists

Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) and the phase-angle (PA), derived from bioelectrical impedance raw values (i.e., resistance, R, and reactance, Xc) allow qualitative and descriptive assessments of body comp...

An online survey using social media investigating the use of kinesiology type tape and McConnell type tape with clinicians who treat cycling related knee pain

Background: The Tour de France will undoubtedly showcase various cycling related injuries in its Yorkshire opening stages in 2014. Patello-Femoral Pain (PFP) is responsible for over 25% of all road cycling injuries and o...

Validity of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer and Reliability of a 4 km Cycle Time Trial

Purpose: To assess the validity of power and the reliability of a 4 km cycle time trial (TT) using the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer. Methods: The Wahoo KICKR power output was assessed using a dynamic calibration rig (DCR...

Validity of Track Aero System to assess aerodynamic drag in professional cyclists

Purpose: Aerodynamic drag is the main resistance (80-90 %) among the total resistive forces (RT, N) opposing motion on level ground in cycling. It is important to decrease it to improve the performance in time-trial (TT)...

Potentiation of sprint cycling performance: the effects of a high-inertia ergometer warm-up

Background: Individual response to acute post-activation potentiation (PAP) stimulation is affected by factors such as the conditioning protocol design, training status, and biomechanical similarity of the conditioning a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP2907
  • DOI -
  • Views 826
  • Downloads 200

How To Cite

Osman Isvan (2015). Wind speed, wind yaw and the aerodynamic drag acting on a bicycle and rider. Journal of Science and Cycling, 4(1), 42-50. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-2907