Wpływ niedozwolonego charakteru klauzuli na związanie stron umową
Journal Title: Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
The paper address the problem of influence by the unfair contract provisions on binding power of the whole contract. The author first concludes that binding of the parties by a contract is possible only if the remaining (fair) provisions form a contract, and therefor if they include at least the minimal provisions that result in consensus. Secondly, the elimination of the contested unfair provision from the contract cannot results in creation and binding power of legal relationship which would be forbidden by/unvalid under the law. Thirdly, since the unfair terms` statutory regulation is the implementation into the Polish law of the Article 6(1) of the Directive 93/13, therefore it should be interpreted in such a way, to ensure, as much as possible, the conformity of Polish regulation with EU legislation. The analysis of the case law of EU Tribunal of Justice and the Polish regulations result in the conclusion that the unfair term cannot be replaced by the dispositive statutory provisions, nor by any other substitutive/replacement means (e.g. constituent court judgments, mandatory statutory provisions, interpretative reduction of parties` statements) that could fill in the gap remaining after removal of the unfair clause. However such “substitutive measures” could and should be used (if provided by national law) only if when this could prevent the ineffectiveness/failure of the whole contract. This rule is applicable also to other “substitutive measures” than the dispositive statutory provisions, which in accordance with the national law would allow the effectiveness of the contract, following the restoration of the contractual balance, if such measures are in accordance with Directive 93/13. It was also accepted in the paper that the consumer cannot bind the court and contradict the use by the court of such a “substitutive measure” (e.g., the norm stemming out of the dispositive statutory provision) if its use could prevent the failure of the whole contract. The assessment, whether the contract can still be binding following the exclusion of unfair terms should be done by a court on the basis of objective criteria, independent for the will of an individual consumer
Authors and Affiliations
Iwona Karasek-Wojciechowicz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP514737
- DOI -
- Views 44
- Downloads 0
Prowizja agenta w czasie trwania umowy (imperatywny czy dyspozytywny charakter regulacji i wynikające z tego konsekwencje)
The text deals with Article 761 § 1 of the Polish Civil Code which is contained in the regulation of commercial agency contract. The provision awards an agent the right to claim commission for contracts concluded with cl...
Possession and possessory remedies in the Draft of Modifications to the Civil Code of Russian Federation in the mirror of Jhering’s doctrine of possession
A core idea behind Rudolf von Jhering’s doctrine of possession is that possession is an external manifestation of the right of ownership. Therefore, as a matter of fact, possessory remedies are aimed at facilitating prot...
Wpływ niedozwolonego charakteru klauzuli na związanie stron umową
The paper address the problem of influence by the unfair contract provisions on binding power of the whole contract. The author first concludes that binding of the parties by a contract is possible only if the remaining...
Regulacja umów o pośrednictwo w DCFR (wzorcem dla ustawodawcy polskiego?)
The article addresses the problem of regulation of commercial intermediation contracts in Polish private law. The main emphasis has been put on commercial agency, franchising and distribution contracts, along with accomp...
Geneza zasad ochrony wierzycieli spółek kapitałowych
This article presents the origins of corporate creditor protection mechanisms in the Western legal tradition. It begins with Roman law and its conception of corporate juristic persons (universitas). The Medieval institut...