Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 69, Issue

Abstract

According to art. 11 sentence 1 k.p.c., the civil court is bound by the findings of a non-appealable verdict issued in criminal proceedings, concercing committing a crime. Generality and vagueness of this term causes considerable problems in practice, in particular with regard to binding of the civil court with findings of the criminal court on the amount of damage caused by the offender. The author, after outlining the situation of applying different procedures to the same act and identifying the normative basis of binding of the civil court with the criminal court judgment, analyzes the situations of determining the amount of property damage by the criminal court in case of conviction for: 1) crimes which element is danger of a damage property, 2) crimes which element is the possibility of causing damage to property, 3) crimes, in case of which the question of causing damage to property is with no meaning to constituting elements of a crime. It is essential whether the appropriate findings were made by the criminal court in the operative part or the grounds of the judgment. The study also addresses the problem of binding of a civil court with the conciction for an attempt of a crime.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Wantoła

Keywords

Related Articles

Spółdzielcze własnościowe prawo do lokalu a prawo odrębnej własności lokalu. Przeszłość, teraźniejszość oraz perspektywa na kolejne 100 lat

The article is a review of housing cooperative law in the last 100 years. The aim is to approximate one of the limited real rights contained in article 244 of the Civil Code, a cooperative ownership right to a flat. Indi...

The “Rule of Law” and the “Rechtsstaat”: A Historical and Theoretical Approach from a German Perspective

The Rule of Law, understood in its most general and original meaning as an absence of arbitrariness in state power, is not merely one legal principle amongst many, but has been the core of law itself in political philoso...

Assessment of Selected Working Conditions of Workers Employed on Drilling and Extraction Platforms in the Light of the European Union and International Law

The paper discusses working conditions of workers employed on drilling and extraction platforms as provided for in the Act on maritime labour of August 5, 2015 (henceforth Maritime Labour Act) from the viewpoint of the t...

British-Polish Protocol in light of the Court of Justice of the European Union jurisprudence (N.S. v Secretary of State, Bonda, Fransson)

The Protocol No. 30 on the application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to Poland and to the United Kingdom, so called “British-Polish Protocol”, annexed in 2007 to the Treaties by means of the...

The Hans Island Dispute and the Doctrine of Occupation

The tiny Hans Island, claimed by both Canada and Denmark, is the latest disputed land in Arctic. The aim of this article is to analyse whether this sovereignty question can be resolved by referring to the doctrine of occ...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP225667
  • DOI -
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Wantoła (2017). Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego. Studia Iuridica, 69(), 47-62. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-225667