An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Open-ended methods that elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) in terms of absolute dollars often result in high rates of questionable and highly skewed responses, insensitivity to changes in health state, and raise an ethical issue related to its association with personal income. We conducted a 2x2 randomized trial over the Internet to test 4 WTP formats: 1) WTP in dollars; 2) WTP as a percentage of financial resources; 3) WTP in terms of monthly payments; and 4) WTP as a single lump-sum amount. WTP as a percentage of financial resources generated fewer questionable values, had better distribution properties, greater sensitivity to severity of health states, and was not associated with income. WTP elicited on a monthly basis also showed promise.

Authors and Affiliations

Laura J. Damschroder, Peter A. Ubel, Jason Riis and Dylan M. Smith

Keywords

Related Articles

Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect

According to the Selective Accessibility Model of anchoring, the comparison question in the standard anchoring paradigm activates information that is congruent with an anchor. As a consequence, this information will be m...

Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners

A type of emergency decision-making which has not received research attention is the police search for a lost person in a rural or wilderness area. For many such incidents, decisions concerning where to search for the lo...

Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment

People experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming othe...

Are medical treatments for individuals and groups like single-play and multiple-play gambles?

People are often more likely to accept risky monetary gambles with positive expected values when the gambles will be played more than once. We investigated whether this distinction between single-play and multiple-play g...

A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment

Overprecision is the most robust type of overconfidence. We present a new method that significantly reduces this bias and offers insight into its underlying cause. In three experiments, overprecision was significantly re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677572
  • DOI -
  • Views 165
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Laura J. Damschroder, Peter A. Ubel, Jason Riis and Dylan M. Smith (2007). An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677572