Are the Recommended Criteria for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Applicable to 12-core Prostate Biopsy Scheme? A Multicentre Study of Urooncology Association, Turkey

Journal Title: The Bulletin of Urooncology - Year 2021, Vol 20, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relevance of the Epstein criteria for the 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) scheme with the evaluation of clinicopathologic data recorded in the Urologic Cancer Database - Prostate (UroCaD-P), Urooncology Association, Turkey (UOAT). Materials and Methods: Patients with detailed pathological 12-core TRUS-Bx data for each biopsy core and who underwent RP due to PCa were included in this study. A total of 1167 patients from seven different centres were analysed. TRUS-Bx pathological findings were separately evaluated in the areas matching the sextant biopsy (6-core paramedian-lateral) scheme and in all 12-core biopsy areas (12-core biopsy scheme). Overall detection rates of PCa and ratios of clinically significant (sPCa) and insignificant PCa (insPCa) after RP were defined and compared between the biopsy schemes. Biopsy findings, according to the Epstein criteria, were also compared between the two schemes. A model for each biopsy scheme was created, including the Epstein criteria and additional biopsy findings using logistic regression analysis to predict clinically sPCa after RP. Results: There was a high correlation for the prediction of clinically insPCa between the two biopsy schemes in the same population. However, 7.3% of PCa could not be diagnosed in the 6-core TRUS-Bx scheme. Also, 69.4% of these had clinically sPCa according to the Epstein criteria in 12-core TRUS-Bx scheme and 51.8% of these were clinically sPCa after RP. The presence of perineural invasion (PNI) in 12-core biopsy was also significant regarding predicting sPCa (p<0.001). Conclusion: The Epstein criteria in 12-core prostate biopsy provide a better prediction of clinically sPCa than the 6-core biopsy scheme. Biopsy PNI findings appeared to improve the effectiveness of 12-core prostate biopsy, in addition to the Epstein criteria.

Authors and Affiliations

Serdar Çelik, Fuat Kızılay, Kutsal Yörükoğlu, Haluk Özen, Bülent Akdoğan, Volkan İzol, Yıldırım Bayazıt, Güven Aslan, Sinan Sözen, Sümer Baltacı, Talha Müezzinoğlu, Fehmi Narter, Levent Türkeri

Keywords

Related Articles

Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy

Objective: We aimed to report the consistency between transrectal needle biopsy (TRNB) Gleason scores (GSs) and prostatectomy specimen GSs based on upgrading and downgrading rates. Materials and Methods: Data of patient...

Evaluation of General Features of Patients with Testicular Cancer

Objective: Testicular cancers (Tca) are most common in men aged 20-34. Despite the increase in its incidence, the mortality rate from Tca decreases. In our study, it was aimed to evaluate the general characteristics, the...

Predictive Value of Duration and Frequency of Macroscopic Haematuria for Stage, Prognosis and Recurrence in Bladder Cancer Patients

Objective: We aimed to investigate the predictive value of duration and frequency of macroscopic haematuria for the stage, prognosis and recurrence rates in primary bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrospectiv...

Management of Patients with Urological Cancers in Turkey during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations of Uro-oncology Association

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has been declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The number of cases has increased over time in correlation with the increasing number of testing worldwide. In order to...

Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection Rates of Cognitive Fusion-targeted Biopsy and Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is a difference between standard prostate needle biopsies and cognitive fusion prostate biopsies (classical 12-core plus 2 cognitive lesions) for any prost...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP693531
  • DOI 10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1677
  • Views 81
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Serdar Çelik, Fuat Kızılay, Kutsal Yörükoğlu, Haluk Özen, Bülent Akdoğan, Volkan İzol, Yıldırım Bayazıt, Güven Aslan, Sinan Sözen, Sümer Baltacı, Talha Müezzinoğlu, Fehmi Narter, Levent Türkeri (2021). Are the Recommended Criteria for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Applicable to 12-core Prostate Biopsy Scheme? A Multicentre Study of Urooncology Association, Turkey. The Bulletin of Urooncology, 20(1), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-693531