Berkeley, Newton, Explanation, and Causation

Journal Title: Ruch Filozoficzny - Year 2018, Vol 74, Issue 4

Abstract

Berkeley notably compares his view of scientific (natural law) explanation—particularly in mechanics, astronomy, and optics—to Newton’s. The difficulty is that while for Newton basic laws, of astronomy for example, implicitly refer to efficient causes (henceforth “causes”) Berkeley allows causes only in metaphysics, more specifically causality through will or volition. Both men do think of explanation in terms of deducing particular generalizations from those more general; the deductive-nomological model of explanation (DN). Meeting its constraints, however, is not sufficient for an example of the DN form to be an explanation. I explore whether this is a problem for Berkeley, looking at two contemporary proposals for non-causal explanations, concluding neither is workable. It remains unresolved, then, whether Berkeley’s use of the DN model should, as he wishes, count as explanatory. The main text is De Motu

Authors and Affiliations

Richard Brook

Keywords

Related Articles

Post-Rickert value in theories of literature

In this article I would like to present a short overview of the methods try to rec- ognize problems in those disciplines and think about how many of the findings Rickert (especially the value) could be indicated in mode...

Substance and Person: Berkeley on Descartes and Locke

In his post-1720 works, Berkeley focuses his comments about Descartes on mechanism and about Locke on general abstract ideas. He warns against using metaphysical principles to explain observed regularities, and he extend...

Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen Herder und Kant zum Thema der Natur der Sprache

The aim of the paper is to compare the concept of language in the philosophy of Herder and Kant. Kant insists on the dualism of thought and language - concepts, thoughts and ideas are ontologically preverbal. In this reg...

Berkeley on Voluntary Motion: A Conservationist Account

A plausible reading of Berkeley’s view of voluntary motion is occasionalism; this, however, leads to a specious conclusion against his argument of human action. Differing from an unqualified occasionalist reading, I cons...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP493514
  • DOI 10.12775/RF.2018.034
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Richard Brook (2018). Berkeley, Newton, Explanation, and Causation. Ruch Filozoficzny, 74(4), 21-32. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-493514