Circadian rhythms and second language performance
Journal Title: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching - Year 2017, Vol 7, Issue 1
Abstract
Human behavior is not constant over the hours of the day, and there are considerable individual differences. Some people raise early and go to bed early and have their peek performance early in the day (“larks”) while others tend to go to bed late and get up late and have their best performance later in the day (“owls”). In this contribution we report on three projects on the role of chronotype (CT) in language processing and learning. The first study (de Bot, 2013) reports on the impact of CT on language learning aptitude and word learning. The second project was reported in Fang (2015) and looks at CT and executive functions, in particular inhibition as measured by variants of the Stroop test. The third project aimed at assessing lexical access in L1 and L2 at preferred and non-preferred times of the day. The data suggest that there are effects of CT on language learning and processing. There is a small effect of CT on language aptitude and a stronger effect of CT on lexical access in the first and second language. The lack of significance for other tasks is mainly caused by the large interindividual and intraindividual variation.
Authors and Affiliations
Kees de Bot, Fang Fang
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP256589
- DOI 10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.1.3
- Views 119
- Downloads 0
Editorial
.
Review of Uncovering English-medium instruction: Glocal issues in higher education; Authors: Branka Drljača Margić, Irena Vodopija-Krstanović; Publisher: Peter Lang, 2017; ISBN: 9781787070578; Pages: 142
.
Book review
.
Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence
This paper synthesizes cross-sectional studies of the effect of proficiency on second language (L2) pragmatics to answer the synthesis question: Does proficiency affect adult learners’ pragmatic competence? Findings have...
Successful language learning in a corporate setting: The role of attribution theory and its relation to intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Attribution theory (Weiner, 1985) and self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) have been explored as contributors to L2 motivation (cf. Dörnyei, 2001) but have never been studied quantitatively in concert. In additi...