Comparison of Different Doses of Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine with Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response To Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anesthesia

Journal Title: International Journal of Medical Research Professionals - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and intubation are associated with a sympathetically mediated circulatory response due to irritation of respiratory tract which is associated with increase in pulse rate and blood pressure that may be dangerous. Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine and compare of different doses of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine with fentanyl on haemodynamic response to intubation in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: 90 patients ASA1, ASA2 scheduled to undergo elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled in double blind prospective randomized controlled trial. They were randomly allocated to one of the following groups. Group A received 2 micro gram/kg fentanyl intravenously10 minutes before induction. Group B received 2 micro gram/kg fentanyl and 0.5 microgram/kg dexmedetomidine intravenously 10 mins prior to induction. Group C received 2 mico gram/kg fentanyl and 1 microgram/kg dexmedetomidine i.v. 10 minutes prior to induction. Results: The two groups were comparable in their demographic profiles. Both study groups (B & C) were comparable with respect to their heart rate at base line, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 5 and 10 minutes after inhalation. Group C (Dexmedetomidine 1μg) demonstrated a greater suppression of chronotropic response to intubation as compared together two groups. Both the groups (B & C) were comparable to their SBP at base line, 2, 5 and 10 minutes. Group C demonstrated a better suppression of the pressor response to intubation compared to other two groups.

Authors and Affiliations

Sandeep Kothari, Priyanka Saini, Anita Kothari, Gaurav Sharma

Keywords

Related Articles

Management of Complex Non Union in Long Bones with Limb Reconstruction System (Rail Fixator) Application

Introduction: Nonunion is complete suspension of the process of union because of arrest of the repair process and radiological or clinical evidence of healing has not been seen for months. There is still controversy rega...

Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors Among General Population in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia

Background: The prevalence of the coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasing in the developing countries, including Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study is to evaluate knowledge of CAD risk factors and to appraise the re...

To Evaluate the Incidence of Prostatic Disorders and Correlate the Relationship of Presenting Complaints with Prostatic Disorders

Background: The diseases of prostate gland are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality among adult males worldwide. The most frequently encountered diseases affecting prostate are prostatitis, benign prostati...

Evaluation of Clinical Profile and Etiology of Pancytopenia in Adults Above 18 Years

Background: Pancytopenia is an important challenge in our routine clinical practice by hematological entity. There are different swing in its pattern, treatment procedures, and outcome. The aim of this study to evaluated...

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Self-Ear Cleaning Among Medical Students, Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia

Background: Wax is the normal and healthy substance that has several functions, the quantity of production differs between individuals. Also, its components vary according to race. Most of the individuals of the populati...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP530250
  • DOI 10.21276/ijmrp.2018.4.1.084
  • Views 57
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sandeep Kothari, Priyanka Saini, Anita Kothari, Gaurav Sharma (2018). Comparison of Different Doses of Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine with Fentanyl on Haemodynamic Response To Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anesthesia. International Journal of Medical Research Professionals, 4(1), 406-409. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-530250