COMPARISON OF PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATHOLOGY RESULTS

Journal Title: Kocatepe Medical Journal - Year 2024, Vol 25, Issue 2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, it was planned to investigate the effectiveness of biopsy parameters of patients who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in predicting the results of subsequent radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2021 and June 2023, patients (n=106) who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy after prostate cancer was diagnosed in transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) were included in the study. The pathology findings detected in prostate needle biopsy and those found in radical prostatectomy material were compared. RESULTS: The consistency for tumor localization in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens was %62,2 (66/106). The consistency rate of Gleason scores in both specimens was 69% (70/106). High positive core rate detected in biopsy was associated with more extracapsular invasion and perineural invasion (PNI) in radical prostatectomy specimens (p<0.001, p=0.010, respectively). The high mean tumor percentage detected in biopsy was associated with high extracapsular extension, PNI, and high surgical margin positivity in radical prostatectomy specimens (p<0.001, p=0.004, p=0.021, respectively). High Gleason score detected in biopsy was associated with higher tumor percentage, higher extracapsular extension, and more PNI in radical prostatectomy specimens (r=0.302, p=0.002, r=0.316, p=0.001, r=0.238, p=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The pathological data of TRUS-Bx will determine the treatment to be applied, but it should be kept in mind that although its place in prostate cancer is undisputed, it may not be completely correlated with radical prostatectomy pathology. Additional tools are needed to bring this correlation to higher levels. However, it should be taken into account that the high number of cancer detected cores and the high mean tumor percentage in TRUS-Bx, may lead to a more advanced tumor risk in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors and Affiliations

Mustafa KARALAR, Osman GERÇEK, Veli Mert YAZAR, Kemal ULUSOY

Keywords

Related Articles

EFFECT OF BEE BREAD ON LIVER 5HT2B-MEDIATED GLUCOSE REGULATION IN ALZHEIMER'S RAT MODEL

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the effect of bee bread on glucose regulation and weight change through the change of insulin, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), and leptin hormones in the rat model of Alzheim...

LARYNGEAL CANCER SURGICAL RESULTS; 10 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

OBJECTIVE: In this study, it was aimed to present the patients who underwent open laryngectomy in a tertiary otolaryngology clinic with current literature information in terms of age, gender, first symptom and duration,...

METHODS USED IN ACTIVE AND PASSIVE TARGETING OF NANO CARRIERS TO CANCER CELLS

With the developments in nanotechnology, nanomaterial-based drug delivery systems with their increasing and ease of use, have powerful properties in targeting drug molecules to tumor tissue, breaking multi-drug resistanc...

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PEEP APPLICATIONS ON OPTIC NERVE SHEATH DIAMETER IN OBESE PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

OBJECTIVE: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application, which is used to improve oxygenation by keeping the alveoli open, may cause an additional increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) during pneumoperitoneum in...

A NIGHTMARE FOR TRANSPLANT PHYSICIANS: BONE MARROW DONOR CANDIDATES WITHDRAWING FROM THE DONATION PROCESS

OBJECTIVE: Although there have been remarkable developments regarding stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in Turkey, but the number of people who would like to be stem cell donors is not yet at the desired level. The presen...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP740641
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1343216
  • Views 45
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mustafa KARALAR, Osman GERÇEK, Veli Mert YAZAR, Kemal ULUSOY (2024). COMPARISON OF PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATHOLOGY RESULTS. Kocatepe Medical Journal, 25(2), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-740641