DEEP SEDATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN SCREENING COLONOSCOPIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Journal Title: European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 9

Abstract

Background and aims: The cornerstone of colon cancer prevention is high-quality examination of the entire colonic mucosa performed with sedation. Deep sedation (DS) has been correlated to greater patient satisfaction, shorter procedures, and faster recoveries. However, disagreement exists on whether DS correlates to an increase in adenoma detection rate (ADR), a surrogate marker of colonic visualization. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the previously published research on the association between DS versus moderate sedation (MS) and ADR in colon cancer screening colonoscopies. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases from inception through May 2019, to identify all studies that evaluated the association between DS with propofol versus MS and the ADR. We included studies that presented an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or presented the data sufficient to calculate the OR with a 95% CI. Statistical analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA), Version 3 software. Results: Five studies with a total of 112,008 patients undergoing screening colonoscopies were included in this study, 6,476 of which received DS with propofol (5.8%). The pooled OR for ADR is 1.137 (95% CI: 1.019 – 1.269, P<0.05, I2 = 17%) in patients who underwent DS with propofol compared to MS. No publication bias was found using Egger’s regression test. Conclusions: Our results indicate that patients receiving DS with propofol are 14 percent more likely to have an adenoma detected during a screening colonoscopy than those who receive MS. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest meta-analysis to assess this association. Future prospective randomized research is needed to confirm this association and suggest changes in the standard practices of sedation during screening colonoscopies.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Madhusudhan R. Sanaka

Keywords

Related Articles

A STUDY OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AMONG DNA CONTENT IN DRUPE, POME, HESPIRIDIUM, PEPO AND COMPLEX FRUITS

Genomic DNA extraction is an important aspect of plant molecular biological research. The objective of the study was to recommend the cheap and efficient genomic DNA extraction method for some economically important frui...

PRODUCTION OF NOVEL ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS FROM ACTINOMYCETES ISOLATED FROM WASTE DUMP SOIL IN WESTERN UGANDA

Drug resistant and opportunistic organisms are a problem to medical health due to the fact that most of the drugs that were used are now not effective. Currently there is a need to search for new drugs that can enhance t...

COMPARISON BETWEEN ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY AND CALCANEAL PERFORATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PLANTAR FASCIITIS AND CALCANEAL SPUR

Background: Ignoring plantar fasciitis may result in chronic heel pain that hinders the regular activities. Prolonged standing, decreased range of ankle dorsiflexion, an intense running regime and obesity are all risk fa...

CYSTITIS IN WOMEN: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE IN SRI LANKA

Introduction: Urinary tract infection is the infection of any part of the urinary tract. Sexual activity may be responsible for high infection rate in sexually active women as honeymoon cystitis begins once the women bec...

APPLICATION OF PMMA AND PHEMA IN EYE PROTECTING CONTACT LENSES

Contact lenses are manufactured by sophisticated polymer, are usually worn during the day time and taken out every night for cleaning. Recently, contact lenses are gaining popularity among lens wearers. Basically, they a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP671795
  • DOI -
  • Views 157
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Madhusudhan R. Sanaka (2019). DEEP SEDATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE IN SCREENING COLONOSCOPIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 6(9), 48-55. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-671795