Enlarging the market yet decreasing the profit: An experimental study of competitive behavior when investment affects the prize

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 4

Abstract

In many competitive situations, our investments increase our gains: Developing better products or research proposals may lead to higher contracts or patents or larger grants. Does increasing investment in such cases always guarantee higher gains? We used an experimental repeated competition game in which prizes depended on contestants’ investments (n=108). Contestants invested more when they increased the potential prize (“enlarge the market”), yet in some cases this tendency was counterproductive (“decrease the profit”): Contestants in fact diminished their earnings, compared to sitting out the competition and keeping their initial funds. Moreover, when a contestant’s investment decreased an opponent’s prize, the contestant tended to invest less; this effect, in turn, led to higher overall gains for both contestants. This result implies that prosocial considerations are at play. Notably, in certain situations, excessive competitive tendencies may lead to a larger waste of resources.

Authors and Affiliations

Einav Hart, Judith Avrahami and Yaakov Kareev

Keywords

Related Articles

Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience

When deciding for others based on explicitly described odds and outcomes, people often have different risk preferences for others than for themselves. In two pre-registered experiments, we examine risk preference for oth...

Improved realism of confidence for an episodic memory event

We asked whether people can make their confidence judgments more realistic (accurate) by adjusting them, with the aim of improving the relationship between the level of confidence and the correctness of the answer. This...

How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two studies, we analyzed...

Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox

Decision makers are often ambiguity averse, preferring options with subjectively known probabilities to options with unknown probabilities. The Ellsberg paradox is the best-known example of this phenomenon. Ambiguity has...

Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation

In two studies on mobile phone purchase decisions, we investigated consumers’ decision strategies with a newly developed process tracing tool called InterActive Process Tracing (IAPT). This tool is a combination of sever...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678253
  • DOI -
  • Views 144
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Einav Hart, Judith Avrahami and Yaakov Kareev (2016). Enlarging the market yet decreasing the profit: An experimental study of competitive behavior when investment affects the prize. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(4), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-678253