European integration discourse: problems of nomination and terminologization.

Abstract

The variation of names for European integration discourse in the field of scientific communication has been given greater weight in light of the ongoing dismantling of disciplinary boundaries between linguistics and social sciences. However, transdisciplinary advances of this kind inflict terminological difficulties and challenge the understanding of the notions labelled by the terms in question. This paper reveals the specificities of names for the notion of European integration discourse as they are used in the fields of humanities and social sciences. In particular, it singles out variants of the names under review from research publications written in Ukrainian and in English, examines their word-building, semantic and communicative features as well as provides reasons for the need to further terminologize the noun phrase European integration discourse and its near equivalent in Ukrainian yevrointehratsiynyj dyskurs in transdisciplinary-based discourse studies. To conclude, the structural variation of the noun phrases used to refer to European integration discourse in Ukrainian and English research publications, their contextual dependence and the lack of semantic unity coupled with the inconsistency in use on the part of a number of authors who indicate incompleteness in the formation of their terminological meanings. In addition, since the degree of terminologization of the noun phrases differs in Ukrainian and English, we assume that there is a certain struggle between these names for the opportunity to take the niche of the basic term in reference to European integration discourse in transdisciplinary research which would contribute to successful scientific communication. The establishment of typological features of European integration discourse in the field of discourse studies shall contribute to the further development of the noun phrases yevrointehratsiynyj dyskurs / European integration discourse as terms.

Authors and Affiliations

Г. Л. Кривенко

Keywords

Related Articles

Spacial Deixis as Language Universal

This article investigates primary spatial deixis in typologically different, genetically related and unrelated languages. It is argued that demonstratives (this and that) and locatives (here and there) are universals. Th...

Intentionality of misery lit texts

The article highlights the intentionality of misery lit texts. The notions “intention” and “intentionality” are considered. Narrator’s communicative intentions, singled out in descriptive, narrative and argumentative dis...

Mediators and intermediaries in a fairy tale: the problem of differentiation.

The article highlights the notions of a “mediator” and an “intermediary” in a fairy tale. Fairy tales date back to the mythological ideas of the ancestors since the fairy tale was a transitional phenomenon between mythol...

Communicative failures in the interethnic interaction situation: definition and main characteristic features.

The given article deals with the notion of communicative failures. The definition of the above mentioned notion is given and its main characteristic features are enumerated on the material of the English media discourse....

ДІАХРОНІЧНА РЕТРОСПЕКТИВА: УКРАЇНСЬКЕ УСНЕ МОВЛЕННЯ ЗА ПИСЕМНИМИ ПАМ’ЯТКАМИ

Статтю присвячено аналізу українського усного мовлення на діахронному рівні, зокрема з’ясуванню вимовних особливостей української мови, зафіксованих у пам’ятках давньо- та староукраїнської літературної мови. Писемні джер...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP439470
  • DOI -
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Г. Л. Кривенко (2017). European integration discourse: problems of nomination and terminologization.. Науковий вісник Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія: Філологічні науки (мовознавство), 8(1), 116-120. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-439470