Functional Outcome Of Open Reduction And Internal Fixation Of Segmental (BIFOCAL) Forearm Fractures

Abstract

Background- Segmental fractures of the forearm bones are rare and occasionally seen by trauma surgeons. These are often seen in high velocity injuries, and hence are accompanied by high degree of comminution and compounding of fracture fragments. Proper preoperative planning is required for optimal restoration of forearm function .Although Segmental fractures of forearm bones have been classified by AO group, it does not provide a treatment algorithm .Aim of our study is to analyze the functional outcome of segmental forearm fractures treated by various modalities, and to classify these fractures based on management modalities. Materials and methods- Between January 2009 to December 2015 19 patients with segmental forearm fractures who underwent operative management were included. Patients less than 18 years and group III-b and group III -c open fractures (Gustilo and Anderson) were excluded . For the study purpose the segmental fractures of (radius or ulna) were classified in to five groups and operative procedure was defined for each group based on fracture location and pattern. Results - A total of 19 patients were included in the study. 16 were male and 3 female patients. According to the Grace and Eversmann rating system 9 patients (47%) had an excellent result, 7 patients (36%) had good result, and 3 patients (15%) had acceptable result. Conclusions- Although segmental fracture pattern can be classified by AO classification, guide lines for management of these fractures have not been defined. Based on our classification and treatment algorithm for segmental forearm fractures in 19 patients we had good to excellent results in 16(84%). Average union time in our series was 30 weeks. An Attempt has been made to classify segmental forearm fractures based on treatment modalities which can be adapted for most segmental fractures.. Our study has limitations in that it involves a small number of patients and further long term randomized control studies are needed.

Authors and Affiliations

Santosh S Jeevannavar, Prasanna Baindoor, Keshav S Shenoy

Keywords

Related Articles

A Comparative Study Of Treatment Of Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Between Plate Osteosynthesis And Non-Operative Treatment

Background:Clavicle fractures are common fractures of the shoulder girdle occuring more commonly in men especially in the region of middle one-third of clavicle. Methods of treatment include both conservative and surg...

Functional Outcome Of Distal Tibia Giant Cell Tumour

This is a prospective study of the functional outcomes of Giant cell tumor of tibia. Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermediate, locally aggressive but rarely metastasizing tumor. A total of 6 patients were studi...

A Comparative Study On Management Of Colles’ Fracture By Closed Manipulation And Casting Versus Closed Manipulation, K-Wiring And Casting

Background: Colles’ fracture is one of the common injuriesin Orthopaedic practice. Since most of these are commonly managed by closed manipulation and casts, these invariably unite in malpositiondue to loss of reduction...

Intramedullary Fixation Of Femur Fractures - A Study On Outcome Assessment

Purpose Distal femur fractures are complex in nature and need special management. Because of the proximity of these fractures to the knee joint, regaining full knee motion and function may be difficult. The present study...

A Study Of Functional Outcome Of Surgical Management Of Floating Knee Among Adults

Background: ‘Floating knee injury’ is a term used to denote ipsilateral femoral and tibial metaphyseal injuries. However, recently termhas been expanded to include most ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia. There...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP543583
  • DOI -
  • Views 98
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Santosh S Jeevannavar, Prasanna Baindoor, Keshav S Shenoy (2018). Functional Outcome Of Open Reduction And Internal Fixation Of Segmental (BIFOCAL) Forearm Fractures. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 4(2), 52-58. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-543583