Jane Austen’s Persuasion

Journal Title: Res Rhetorica - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

The essay begins by asserting that fiction is persuasion—subtle, indirect, undogmatic, nevertheless it has designs on the reader and is a mode of communication. The example of Jane Austen gives particular illustrations of persuasion as a subject, including self-persuasion (in Emma); the easy persuasion of an unresisting subject (in Sense and Sensibility); and difficult and unwelcome persuasion (in Persuasion).

Authors and Affiliations

Merritt Moseley

Keywords

Related Articles

Telewizyjne Opowieści Transformacyjne – między misją a rozrywką. Analiza retoryczna przekazu gatunku makeover show

The subject of the dissertation are television programs with a plot based on a quick, radical and spectacular transformation of the main character. The article fi ts into the current research on media rhetoric from the p...

Między chaosem a porządkiem – retoryczne zmagania z wybuchem I wojny światowej na łamach „Tygodnika Ilustrowanego”

Analiza tekstów opublikowanych w latach 1913-1914 (przed wybuchem I wojny światowej) w „Tygodniku Ilustrowanym” wskazuje, iż wydawane w Warszawie pismo koncentrowało swoją uwagę przed wszystkim na zachowaniu rozwagi i dy...

The Social False Dilemma: Perpetuating Conflicts between Liberals and Conservatives

This essay addresses the establishment of a social false dilemma in the form of the socially-constructed categories of liberals and conservatives. The illogical positioning of only two options for solving a problem reduc...

The Repetitive Rhetoric of Miscavige’s Battle: A Preliminary Look at the Church of Scientology

The Church of Scientology is currently experiencing a rash of negative publicity regarding its beliefsystem, organizational structure, and practices. Amidst this controversy, Ecclesiastical Leader David Miscavige has con...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP192137
  • DOI 10.17380/rr.2016.2.3
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Merritt Moseley (2016). Jane Austen’s Persuasion. Res Rhetorica, 3(2), 28-36. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-192137