JUDGE'S DISCIPLINARY AMENABILITY FOR DISCLAIMING ABOUT INTERFERENCE IN EXECUTION OF JUSTICE
Journal Title: Міжнародний науковий журнал "Інтернаука". Серія: "Юридичні науки" - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 9
Abstract
This article is of interest to judges of Ukraine and organs, which execute disciplinary proceedings concerning them. Mainly, author’s attention is concentrated on such offense: judge of the High Council of Justice and the General Prosecutor gave any notice in writing about interference in execution of justice, including appeal to judge by litigants or other individuals, including individuals, who were authorized to execute state functions on specific cases, if an appeal was made in other way than it was provided by the procedural law, during five days after he had been informed about such case. At the present, judges have any distinctness about interference in the execution of justice. Experts, who investigate normative principles to secure independence for judges of Ukraine, prove that despite the improvement of constitutional and legislative regulation, corruption, including telephone law and political dependence, is latent occurrence in the courts as result of long-term freemasonry. Judges who committed corruption acts are vulnerable to influence of official bodies, because they waive their independence for impunity. That's why judges don't advise about enforcement in each case, in other cases – they don't consider obvious cases of interference like “friendly request”. Given the foregoing, the question of defining the components of disciplinary offense is currently relevant according to paragraph 6 part 1 article 106 of the Law of Ukraine “About Judicial System and Status of Judges” № 1402-VIII, namely determination of legal content of illegal judge's inaction for disclaiming about interference in execution of justice (or any other influence for making decision on specific case).
Authors and Affiliations
Oksana Mashevska
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP570570
- DOI 10.25313/2520-2308-2018-9-4422
- Views 134
- Downloads 0
FUNCTIONS OF THE LEGAL SERVICE OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE OF UKRAINE: CONCEPT AND CLASSIFICATION
The article deals with general concepts of functions. It is determined that functions are derived from tasks and reveal the content of the activities of any governmental authority. The specific functions of the structura...
FEATURES OF CONSIDERATION OF THE RECONCILIATION AGREEMENT
The author conducts an analysis of the activities of the court in criminal proceedings on the basis of the reconciliation agreement. Features of consideration of the agreement in the preparatory proceedings, if the agree...
REGARDING SOME ISSUES OF PROTECTION OF MEDICAL OFFICERS’ RIGHTS IN CONDITIONS OF REFORM OF SECTOR
The article is devoted to the definition and scientific analysis of the problems of the protection of the rights of medical officers in the conditions of reforming the medical sector. The article deals with the imbalance...
WAYS OF DETERMINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF MORAL (NON-PROPERTY) DAMAGE, CAUSED BY PHYSICAL PERSONALITY
In this article, the authors consider the notion of moral (non-property) damage, as well as ways to determine the amount of compensation for such damage to an individual. Investigating the definition of moral (non-proper...
LINES OF POLICE MEASURES TAKEN BY THE NATIONAL POLICE OF UKRAINE
The article deals types of police measures taken by the National Police of Ukraine. Determined that the powers of the National Police of Ukraine, including the use of various police preventive measures and coercion by th...