КОНЦЕПЦИЯ СМЕХА В ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРАГМАТИЗМА
Journal Title: Гуманітарний часопис - Year 2018, Vol 1, Issue 2
Abstract
Volodymyr Zharkih CONCEPT OF LAUGHTER IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRAGMATISM The paradox in the title can be explained by the seeming in compatability of laughter and philosophy, since there appears to be little in common between fundamental problems of philosophy and a fleeting, emotional and situational outburst of laughter. This paradox becomes less unexpected if viewed through the context of interrelation between philosophy and linguistics as was suggested by early pragmatists. Their postulates were developed in the theory of the so called «linguistic turn», within which this interrelation became the most important methodological concept. It postulated that thought is objectivizedin the process of social usage of language. Its rules are regulated by the consensus of the language community as to what is right / wrong concerning language rules / norms and validity of truth criteria of judgments and statements. No less significant is the cognitive value of the seme and the frequency of its usage. The more the seme is needed, the more plastic it becomes within the semantic triangle where it functions. Since there is no absolute coincidence in similar life situations, verbal symbols expressing ideas, things, phenomena, often tend to be used in a transferred sense to better express the unique character of a given reality. Cognitive change and mobility in the semantic structure of the word laughter is a good example of this tendency. In Rodale thesaurus itsseme is realized in 29 verbal symbols. The seme of humor, correlated with it, is expressed in 183 verbal units. If to add to them cognitively kindred semes – fun, joviality, gaiety, hilarity, mirth – together with their synonyms and derivatives – the number of verbal units will grow immensely. This wide choice of ways to express a notion shows its cognitive importance. Laughter as a purely human feature is indispensible for understanding human life and thus acquires a deep philosophical significance. Classical pragmatists, W. James, J. Dewey, F. C. S. Schiller, to name only a few, considered laughter as a handy and useful tool by means of which man can determine the difference between good and bad. He can do it by referring to the wealth of his native language and by using it to understand and make himself understood. Keywords: laughter, humor, semantics of verbal units, culture of social relations.
Authors and Affiliations
Володимир Жарких
ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ОСОБИСТОСТІ МАЙБУТНЬОГО ФАХІВЦЯ АЕРОКОСМІЧНОЇ ГАЛУЗІ
Inna Bidyuk PERSONALITY FEATURES OF FUTURE SPECIALIST IN AEROSPACE SPHERE Modern social processes require special and more profound knowledge not only in a purely subject area, but also in the socio-historical sph...
ОНТОЛОГІЯ КОМУНІКАТИВНОЇ РЕАЛЬНОСТІ
Galyna Omelchenko, Oleksandr Osipov ONTOLOGY OF COMMUINICATIVE REALITY The authors consider the problem of communication as social reality in the context of conceptual representations of non-classical ontology. The...
ИЕРАРХИЯ ПОТРЕБНОСТЕЙ А. МАСЛОУ НЕ СООТВЕСТВУЕТ БИОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ ПРИРОДЕ ЧЕЛОВЕКА
Sadikov G.N. HIERARCHY OF MASLOW NEEDS DOES NOT MATCH THE BIOLOGICAL NATURE OF MAN One of the major criticisms of the theory of needs is the lack of empirical studies, only the theoretical justification is clearly...
ОБРЯДОВА ПРАКТИКА ЯК ЗАСІБ ЗБЕРЕЖЕННЯ КОЛЕКТИВНОЇ ПАМ’ЯТІ: УКРАЇНСЬКИЙ ВИМІР
Olga Bogomolets RITUAL PRACTICE AS MEANS FOR COLLECTIVE MEMORY CONSERVATION: UKRAINIAN VIEWPOINT Developing the strategies for conserving and rendering the social experience, and hence the basis of group identity,...
НИГИЛИЗМ КАК СОЦИОКУЛЬТУРНОЕ ЯВЛЕНИЕ И ЕГО ФОРМЫ
Jadan V.В. NIHILISM AS A SOCIOCULTURAL PHENOMENON AND ITS FORMS. In the modern philosophical and cultural discourse of contemporary cultural situation is called of crisis. The phenomenon of nihilism is an important facto...