Language and Modernity

Abstract

The contemporary Ukrainian society allocates two types of the sociocultural formations, namely traditional and modern. Each of these two has its own values with one mutual value, that is language. According to Robert Hollinger the terms traditional and modern refer to the types of society. As a rule, the traditional society is largely ‘rural, agricultural, authoritarian, religious, relatively small in population, relatively homogeneous and precapitalist or early capitalist’; vice versa the modern society is characterized by ‘the growth of urban areas, various forms of capitalism, democracy, science and technology, massive population grown and concentration, and cultural, political, and religious heterogeneity’ [see 10]. The different features – rural, authoritarian, homogeneous vs urban, democracy, heterogeneity – determine the social attitude to the language; the social functions of the language; the tradition of the language legislation; and the strategies and practices of the languages confrontation or collaboration. It is important to use only one language which has a great value for ‘rural, authoritarian, homogeneous’ society. Here this one language has three main functions: consolidating, separating and integrating and provides the homogeneity. The legislation is aimed at protecting this language. The ‘urban, democracy, heterogeneity’ society provides the other social lingual strategies. The language continues to be the value but it’s not already about the exclusiveness. Much more important is the opportunity of the language to support the changes and diversities; to be the active player in the economic, politic, intellectual spheres; to be able to co-live and co-work with the other languages in multilingual social space in the time of globality.

Authors and Affiliations

О. М. Демська

Keywords

Related Articles

Terminological vocabulary in professionally oriented texts.

This article examines the role of mastering terms in the process of reading professional texts. It is proved that professional terminology contributes to the effective assimilation of knowledge. The expediency of using s...

The typological differentiation of English detective story

The article focuses on the typological differentiation of English detective story which is examined in its variety. According to the fundamental characteristics/ features of different types of detective fiction different...

Predictive implementation of undefined-quantitative semantics in the modern Ukrainian literary language.

In modern Ukrainian language words with accompanying insignificance semantics are associated with predicates of undefined quantity. Due to their semantic branching, it is expedient to distinguish predicates of an undefin...

Media existence of Ukrainian crisis: verbalizing destruction and support (а case of English BBC news stories)

The paper reveals that news stories reconstruct different aspects of a crisis drawing on the preconception structures of sensory-motor origin with an important place occupied by destruction and support opposing it. In Uk...

Film translation as a type of audiovisual translation and its development in Ukraine and worldwide.

The article deals with film translation as a type of audiovisual translation. Special attention is paid to the differentiation of such concepts as “film translation” and “audiovisual translation” because nowadays there i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521752
  • DOI -
  • Views 141
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. М. Демська (2018). Language and Modernity. Науковий вісник Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія: Філологічні науки (мовознавство), 10(), 29-31. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-521752