Learning psychology from riddles: The case of stumpers
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 1
Abstract
Riddles can teach us psychology when we stop to consider the psychological principles that make them “work”. This paper studies a particular class of riddles that we call stumpers, and provides analysis of the various principles (some familiar, some novel) that inhibit most people from finding the correct solution – or any solution – even though they find the answers obvious ex post. We restrict our analysis to four stumpers, propose the psychological antecedents of each, and provide experimental support for our conjectures.
Authors and Affiliations
Maya Bar-Hillel, Tom Noah and Shane Frederick
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678330
- DOI -
- Views 147
- Downloads 0
A Bayesian latent mixture model approach to assessing performance in stock-flow reasoning
People often perform poorly on stock-flow reasoning tasks, with many (but not all) participants appearing to erroneously match the accumulation of the stock to the inflow – a response pattern attributed to the use of a “...
Responsibility judgments of wins and losses in the 2013 chess championship
We report two studies on the perceived responsibility of opponents competing for a goal that can be attained by only one of them. Responsibility judgments were collected in seven samples of lay people and experts before,...
The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox
The St. Petersburg Paradox is a famous economic and philosophical puzzle that has generated numerous conflicting explanations. To shed empirical light on this phenomenon, we examined subjects’ bids for one St. Petersburg...
The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?
When people judge risk or the probability of a risky prospect, single case narratives can bias judgments when a statistical base-rate is also provided. In this work we investigate various methodological and procedural fa...
Prosociality in the economic Dictator Game is associated with less parochialism and greater willingness to vote for intergroup compromise
Is prosociality parochial or universalist? To shed light on this issue, we examine the relationship between the amount of money given to a stranger (giving in an incentivized Dictator Game) and intergroup attitudes and b...