Olympic message: Olympic ideology and Olympic social reality

Journal Title: Choregia - Year 2008, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Olympic sports constitute an exceptionally complex and multidimensional social space, particularly in the framework of accelerated social transformations. The social meaning of Olympic communication has radically been transformed, principally during the last two decades. The influences of other social spaces such as the economy, the mass media and politics have lead to a notional heterogeneia of modern Olympic sports semantics. Today, Olympic institutions and organizational configurations direct their interests exclusively towards economic structures. In other words, implemented without reservations are all the processes that support the commercial profile of Olympic sports and promote it as a commercial-entertainment spectacle. As a result serious contradictions and inconsistencies arise between today’s Olympic social reality and the values advocated by the Olympic movement and the Olympic Charter. Olympic communication practices are primarily connected to economic interests, and as a result it is difficult to define them as conveyors and as means of reflection for foundational social and ethical values. Consequently, the original messages advocated by the 19th century Olympic movement– and in particular by Coubertin with regard to Olympism and Olympic Education– are not reproduced and reactivated in today’s Olympic social reality. Inevitably questions arise such as (1) What is the meaning of Olympic ideology, Olympism and Olympic Education? (2) Is there a discrepancy or a lack of correspondence between the social and ethical values advocated by the Olympic movement and Olympic social reality?

Authors and Affiliations

Nikolaos Patsantaras| Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Athens

Keywords

Related Articles

An Investigation into the Familiarity of Physical Education Experts with Historical, Social and Cultural Aspects of Olympic Games

The purpose of this study was to survey An Investigation into the Familiarity of Physical Education Experts with Historical, Social and Cultural Aspects of Olympic Games. 120 of the physical education experts (The mem...

Why DON’T you Dope?: A preliminary analysis of the factors which influence athletes decision NOT to Dope in Sport

The purpose of this paper is to examine why athletes do not dope in sport. The research treats the ‘problem’ of doping as an issue of ‘control’ and draws on control theory (Hopwood, 1974; Byers, 2013) to analy...

Resident Perceptions of the 2006 Torino Olympic Games, 2002-2007

Previous Olympic Games research has been primarily on economic impacts, tourists, and destination image with most being one-off assessments of the Summer Games. Other than Ritchie's landmark study of the Calgary Winter O...

A Study to Examine Differences in Sporting Event Direct Spending Survey Methods

This study examined differences between direct spending reported through in person surveys administered during a sporting event and online surveys administered after the event’s conclusion. The same direct spending an...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP12546
  • DOI http:dx.doi.org/10.4127/ch.2008.4.1.45-55
  • Views 377
  • Downloads 27

How To Cite

Nikolaos Patsantaras (2008). Olympic message: Olympic ideology and Olympic social reality. Choregia, 4(1), 45-55. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-12546