PROCEDURAL RESPONSIBILITY OF A VICTIM FOR EVASION TO APPEAR WHEN SUMMONED TO INVESTIGATOR, PROSECUTOR, INVESTIGATING JUDGE OR COURT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
Journal Title: Юридичний науковий електронний журнал - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue
Abstract
The current Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine finally secured a victim as a separate and independent participant in the criminal proceedings, which is endowed with certain procedural status. Despite the dispositive rights of the victim in the proceedings of its procedural status and procedural obligations arising, he should perform in any case. As a result of failure or improper performance of its procedural obligations victim it can be brought to criminal procedural justice. The Criminal Procedure Act establishes the obligation of Ukraine victim come to call the investigator, prosecutor, investigator, judge or court and in failing to timely arrival – inform in advance, specifying the reasons for the inability to arrival. Upon committing to victims of criminal procedural violations – no-call to the prosecutor or the investigating judge or court sanction applied to him in the form of imposing monetary penalties. The order making a decision on its imposition and the amount of the penalty will depend on exactly who – pre-trial investigation or court challenge made victim. Investigative judge or court must determine whether there has been willful or reckless evasion victim to appear when summoned. To this end, the investigating judge or court can be given any information that can confirm the failure of his victims’ duty. Such information may be obtained by interviewing relatives, neighbors or acquaintances. The most common evidence of non-appearance is confirmed by the fact that the real victim delivery of summons with due notice of the time and place of arrival, certified by his signature. The first important procedural action that must make in deciding whether the imposition of monetary penalties is the identification and proof of procedural violations. Setting absence of valid reasons for which the victim was unable to call, will be the main factor for recognizing committing procedural violations and application of sanctions in the form of imposing monetary penalties. The only type of event procedural criminal responsibility for specified procedural violation is the imposition of monetary penalties, the amount of which is determined by the court within the prescribed procedural law.
Authors and Affiliations
Л. В. Павловська
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW AS AN ACADEMIC DISCIPLINE
The article deals with some pressing issues of introducing telecommunications law as an academic discipline in higher educational establishments as well as methods, methodology, theme structure relating to its teaching....
STUFFING OF THE SECURITY SERVICE OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF PROTECTION OF THE STATE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IN CONDITIONS OF ITS REFORM
The article is devoted to the coverage of the stuffing of the Security Service of Ukraine as a subject of protection of the state financial system in the conditions of its reform. The author determined that a number of g...
THE CONCEPT OF DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY OF ATTORNEY
In the article, certain aspects of the legal nature of the disciplinary responsibility of a lawyer is analyzed. In particular, some definitions of «disciplinary responsibility of a lawyer» are studied. There are a few va...
UNTAXED MINIMUM INCOMES: ANALYSIS OF THE NATURE OF PHENOMENON
In the article it is analyzed the economic and legal essence of the phenomenon of untaxed minimum of citizens’ income. The history of legal regulation of the phenomenon of untaxed minimum of citizens’ income is examined....
PRINCIPLE OF PARTNERSHIP IN RELATIONS BETWEEN INSTITUTES OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND STATE: CONSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS
The article is devoted to the coverage of the issue related to the constitutional establishment and legislative support of the principle of partnership between the state and civil society. The role of the civil society i...