Soul or Mind? Some Remarks on Explanation in Cognitive Science
Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 2
Abstract
In the article author analyses the extent to which it is possible to regard the Aristotelian conception of the soul as actually necessary and applicable for modern neuroscience. The framework in which this objective is going to be accomplished is provided by the idea of the coexistence of the “manifest” and “scientific” images of the world and persons, as introduced by Wilfrid Sellars. In subsequent sections, author initially formulates an answer to the questions of what it is that Aristotle sought to explain with his conception of soul as formal cause, and how this notion could be portrayed in terms drawn from contemporary neurological science. It is author’s intention to show that no other concepts—be they the Cartesian “mind” or a Chalmers-style “self”—come anywhere close to matching the breadth of scope of Aristotelian “soul”. At the same time, though, analysis carried out here do not intend to undertake any kind of defence of the soul as a spiritual entity of the sort popular where religious faith is concerned, namely as an entity separable from the body, immortal, and inimitably tied to God. Then, in the second major part of the article, author analyses the extent to which the Aristotelian conception of the soul can be thought of as involving criteria of the sort that we encounter in the contemporary theory of strong emergence. According to the author the theory of strong emergence has, as a heuristic theory, quite general predictive and explanatory power as regards the field of human thought and behaviour.
Authors and Affiliations
Józef Bremer
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP327435
- DOI 10.12775/SetF.2017.023
- Views 110
- Downloads 0
The will to love that makes a difference
This essay deals with the question of what really makes human beings exceptional. It is argued that it is a special kind of love that ultimately distinguishes humans from other animals. Although other kinds of considerat...
Czy współczesne nauki przyrodnicze mogą inspirować filozoficzny i teologiczny namysł nad przyczynowością?
Współpraca nauk szczegółowych, filozofii i teologii w analizie relacji i zależności przyczynowych bytów we wszechświecie wydaje się słuszna i uprawniona. Okazuje się jednak, że w praktyce rodzi ona często pewne napięcia,...
¿Sostuvo Aristóteles la inmortalidad del alma? La respuesta de Suárez¿Sostuvo Aristóteles la inmortalidad del alma? La respuesta de Suárez
Claimed Aristotle the immortality of the soul? Suarez responds Suarez discussed the question of the immortality of the soul in Aristotle twice: in his youthful commentary (1574) and at the end of his life (1617). In bot...
La fiabilidad teórica del determinismo. Un examen desde la propuesta de Mariano Artigas
The theoretical reliability of determinism. A review from the proposal of Mariano Artigas This article has two purposes. The first is to demonstrate that the theory of determinism, which claims to be based on the princi...
Razón práctica y primer principio de la ley natural en Suárez
Practical reason and first principle of the natural law in Suárez The aim of this paper is to examine the Suarecian theory of practical reason and its first principle, which is also the first principle of natural law. A...