Świadczenie niegodziwe – trudne dziedzictwo rzymskiej inspiracji

Journal Title: Studia Iuridica - Year 2017, Vol 72, Issue

Abstract

Incorporating the rules inspired by the Roman condictio ob turpem causam into modern regulations of unjustified enrichment provokes criticism. Such regulations are diversified into several models but mostly invoke controversies. The main goal of this paper is evaluating these critical opinions and doubts repeated in legal discourse using historical and comparative methods. Author focuses on five issues: usefulness of condictio ob turpem causam in the light of works of ius commune jurists; doubts concerning the principle in pari turpitudine melior est conditio possidentis; different approach of various European legislators to the idea of condictio ob turpem causam; relation between regulations of unjustified enrichment and unenforceability of agreements contrary to the o law and good customs; importance of the restitution of payments contrary to the law and good customs for today’s legal practice. The conclusions of such analysis allow to admit that doubts concerning the continuation of the Roman condictio ob turpem causam are justified. From the other side, in times of multicultural societies and increasing number of legal regulations the growth of disputes resulted from the payments contrary to law and good customs can be observed. The rejection of repayment based on the contrary to the objective good faith offers – according to the author – the best compromise between weak points of Roman condictio ob turpem causam and challenges of modern practice. In the legal reasoning it is expressed by the maxime „no one shall be heard, who invokes his own guilt”.Incorporating of this maxime into the unjustified enrichment is all the more justified when higher could be in legal practice doubts concerning the acceptability of rejection of restitution of the payment with has been made without legal ground but in the contrary to the principle of good faith.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Dajczak

Keywords

Related Articles

Roszczenie o zapłatę wielokrotności stosownego wynagrodzenia w prawie autorskim – głos w obronie status quo na dzień przed wyrokiem Trybunału Konstytucyjnego

The article contains the response to the criticism of the solution regulated under article 79 section 1 point 3 letter b of the Copyright and Related Rights Act made before the Constitutional Tribunal rendered its judgme...

Związanie sądu cywilnego wyrokiem skazującym sądu karnego za popełnienie przestępstwa konkretnego lub abstrakcyjnego zagrożenia dobra prawnego

According to art. 11 sentence 1 k.p.c., the civil court is bound by the findings of a non-appealable verdict issued in criminal proceedings, concercing committing a crime. Generality and vagueness of this term causes con...

On Philosophy of Legal Education. An Analytical Sketch

Niniejszy esej stanowi próbę filozoficznej refleksji nad rolą i celem edukacji prawniczej. Szczególnie uwzględnia rolę, jaką w tej edukacji mogą odegrać metody prawa porównawczego, teorii prawa oraz historii prawa. Autor...

How Big Can a Flood of the Vistula River be in Warsaw – Historical and Hydrological Perspective

Zarządzanie zagrożeniem powodziowym to nowa metodologia zmniejszania niebezpieczeństw dla przestrzeni miejskiej. Jednym z ważnych aspektów zagrożenia powodziowego jest ekspozycja na zalanie spowodowana niewłaściwą lokali...

Romantyczne inspiracje i bariery polskiej dyskusji o posiadaniu w XX wieku

Twentieth century Polish legal debate on possession adds an original element to the European legal tradition. The author has focused on the inspiring and limiting impact of the legal experience on this field. Legal debat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP345585
  • DOI 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7590
  • Views 69
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Dajczak (2017). Świadczenie niegodziwe – trudne dziedzictwo rzymskiej inspiracji. Studia Iuridica, 72(), 101-119. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-345585