Triple- and double-compound morphological age in evaluation of selected components of physical fitness in girls under the terms of health-related fitness (H-RF)
Journal Title: Antropomotoryka. Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences - Year 2010, Vol 20, Issue 52
Abstract
[b]Aim of the work.[/b] To determine the formula for calculating the age of morphological development; to make an evaluation of somatic determinants of development level under the terms of physical health (H-RF).[b]Material. [/b]The material of the research forms the population of 5229 girls from Małopolska aged 8–17 calendar years, divided into year groups. From these groups the classes of 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17 years of calendar age were chosen as the subjects. After that from each above-mentioned year group, 150 participants were drawn with regard to basic components of physical fitness under the terms of H-RF and morphological age. Then from each year group a team of 50 subjects was selected and ranked in order of the height (upper, middle, lower) and weight (heavy, medium and lighter) of participants.[b]Methods.[/b] In randomly selected groups and in extreme teams, formed in accordance with body height and weight development level, statistical characteristics of basic components of physical fitness (under the terms of H-RF) were calculated due to morphological age, determined on the basis of calendar age, height and weight. Omitting participants from the group of average body weight and height, in remaining teams (each of 50 subjects) the measures were taken in regard to establish standardized mean differences in values of examined physical fitness components and morphological age. Strength of relationship between them was determined using simple and partial correlation coefficients. The significance of intergroup differences and correlation coefficients were examined with the Student’s to-test.[b]Results. [/b]In the majority of relations very poor somatic conditioning of physical activity (under the terms of H-RF) was observed. In groups of high and low body weight and height the structure of calendar age formula for determining the age of morphological development played insignificant role. The greatest influence on numerical value exerted the age of body weight.[b]Conclusions.[/b] In the progressive development of children and adolescents from Małopolska both: somatic and motor developments have run their own tracks. There is no reason for taking into account chronological age in the formula for calculating morphological age, whereas anthropological methods should be taken into account when assessing the progress of children and adolescents’ development of height and body mass.
Authors and Affiliations
Jerzy Januszewski, Edward Mleczko, Renata Nieroda
Motor Fitness of 10–17 Year-Old Students from Selected Regions of Japan and Poland
The aim of the work. The aim of this work is to examine the state and structure of youth motor fitness from the Upper Silesia and Nara regions (taking the three-factor Baltes’s model into consideration).Material and meth...
Sprawność fizyczna w ujęciu zdrowia (H-RF) osób dorosłych w wieku 20–59 lat
Cel pracy. Ocena zróżnicowania społecznego sprawności fizycznej w ujęciu zdrowia (H-RF) osób dorosłych, zamieszkałych na terenie województwa świętokrzyskiego.Materiał i metody. Badania przeprowadzono z zastosowaniem dobo...
The Influence of the Individual Pattern of the Lower Limbs of the Sport Walker on the Moving Torso and Upper Limbs' Movement Ranges During the Start Speed
Introduce: In the previous researches very rarely the subject of the symmetry and asymmetry of the movement technique of the athletes achieving the world highest level in the sport walking was undertaken.Goal of the rese...
Motor fitness and coordination abilities vs. effectiveness of play in sitting volleyball
[b]Aim of the work.[/b] To find relations between coordination abilities, motor fitness and effectiveness of play of sitting volleyball players.[b]Material and methods. [/b]The study material consisted of sixty players o...
O książce – „Zarys teorii budowy ruchów Nikołaja Aleksanrowicza Bernsztejna”, napisanej przez Wacława Petryńskiego – słów kilka